That's the J-35, all J-35A seen to date even including the one on the assembly floor had either no EOTS installed or covered.Isn't there already a Pic or pics with j35/A with eots uncovered bruh
That's the J-35, all J-35A seen to date even including the one on the assembly floor had either no EOTS installed or covered.Isn't there already a Pic or pics with j35/A with eots uncovered bruh
Nah, it should have better stealth than J20 (newer materials, better computer simulation of shape/more research and knowledge on shaping).presumably the shiny paint on the J-20 is shiny because of its radar absorbent content. the fact that J-35 does not have similar shiny paint seem to me to mean either the j-35 has better stealth shaping so it doesn’t need the help from special paint, or very high level of stealth is less critical to the J-35‘s mission than to J-20’s.
Or its too expensive and thus only J-20 has it cause its the premium fighter for the PLA. J-35A is supposed to be the cheap multi-role fighter optimized for strike missions.presumably the shiny paint on the J-20 is shiny because of its radar absorbent content. the fact that J-35 does not have similar shiny paint seem to me to mean either the j-35 has better stealth shaping so it doesn’t need the help from special paint, or very high level of stealth is less critical to the J-35‘s mission than to J-20’s.
J-35 is the premier naval fighter and hence should have top notch RAM, J-35A would probably have similar RAM to reduce cost. It's likely that J-35 simply uses a different type of RAM more suited to naval environment.Or its too expensive and thus only J-20 has it cause its the premium fighter for the PLA. J-35A is supposed to be the cheap multi-role fighter optimized for strike missions.
Or J-35 has less RAM due to expected marine degradation on a carrier?J-35 is the premier naval fighter and hence should have top notch RAM, J-35A would probably have similar RAM to reduce cost. It's likely that J-35 simply uses a different type of RAM more suited to naval environment.