J-35A fighter (PLAAF) + FC-31 thread

CannedFish

New Member
Registered Member
IMO there should be some rhyme and reason behind the numbers they have, but I'm sure it's like chaotic lawful (there's logic and rules, but only the guy making those numbers and the ones agreeing to em know)

Could ba a case by case convention gor all we know
 

valysre

Junior Member
Registered Member
This name disarms the Americans into thinking that it is a cheap copy, and encourage voices at home to say things like "The F-35 is an obsolete platform, we must pivot to blah blah blah."
 

Alfa_Particle

Junior Member
Registered Member
IMO there should be some rhyme and reason behind the numbers they have, but I'm sure it's like chaotic lawful (there's logic and rules, but only the guy making those numbers and the ones agreeing to em know)

Could ba a case by case convention gor all we know
Are they trying to LARP as Wallfacers or what? This ain't the Three-Body Problem.
 

CannedFish

New Member
Registered Member
Are they trying to LARP as Wallfacers or what? This ain't the Three-Body Problem.
Think you're reading too much into this, they have no reason to tell us anything about their naming conventions, whether there's military value in it or not. IMO the names started as just linear program/airframe designations, but now there's more pride taken in their names, a reflection in The PLAAFs confidence in itself and it's accomplishments.
 

Alfa_Particle

Junior Member
Registered Member
Think you're reading too much into this, they have no reason to tell us anything about their naming conventions, whether there's military value in it or not. IMO the names started as just linear program/airframe designations, but now there's more pride taken in their names, a reflection in The PLAAFs confidence in itself and it's accomplishments.
That was a joke from my side :/
 
Top