Are these the alleged changes from the V2 demonstrator to the J-35? Or between the PLAAF variant J-31 and the PLAN NA J-35?
J-35 carrier fighter (PLAN) thread
- Thread starter Deino
- Start date
Are these the alleged changes from the V2 demonstrator to the J-35? Or between the PLAAF variant J-31 and the PLAN NA J-35?
Whatever designation it may end up, it is a beautiful functional bird for China's carriers!
asif iqbal
Lieutenant General
J35 means better deck handling and due to its smaller size quicker turn around
I would not be surprised if J35 sortie rate from 003 is higher than J15 especially if elevator can take 2 x J35
I would not be surprised if J35 sortie rate from 003 is higher than J15 especially if elevator can take 2 x J35
I’m not aware of a PLAAF variant of J-31.
... J-21=J-31=j-35=fc-31, i think until pla reveal its real name, people can call it whatever they like.
in fact, this has puzzled me a while, what makes you believe the plaaf and plan will give two names to one aircraft? or two varients (if there is...)?
Actually I don't know and in fact even if I sue the designation J-35 too, I'm still not sure about this since it makes no sense ... J-21 would be much more logical but maybe - similar to the SAC Flanker family - they will go for different designations for different versions.
That's old fanmade CG.
This is clearly a non official CGI, one that is not exactly new either.
The fact you are not providing commentary, generally means that one thinks the picture would speak for itself.
However what is the point of posting it?
Is it meant to be "just a nice CGI"?
Or is it because you think this is a real picture?
Or what, exactly?
Because let's be honest, we are now all waiting for the J-XY/J-35 to emerge for real, so posting an old CGI picture without commentary is just confusing because it implies you think the picture is somehow significant.