by78
General
That's... A J-35A with a J-16.
Oh yeah, you're right. Thanks for the correction.
That's... A J-35A with a J-16.
So we have another variant of J-35A. I see three J-35A variants:J-35A (top) vs J-35.
So we have another variant of J-35A. I see three J-35A variants:
1. horizontal stablizer in the same fashion as J-35.
2. different horizontal stablizer (from J-35) with a bump/inlet on top of starboard side engin inlet.
3. different horizontal stablizer (from J-35) without such bump/inlet.
This photo is reversedI meant the top photo (J-35A) being "3. different horizontal stablizer (from J-35) without such bump/inlet."
View attachment 140189
how blind I was not seeing the "75" reversed.This photo is reversed
Never mind the J-35/15.So as everyone tracking this thread is probably already aware of, SAC's twin engine 6th gen fighter was revealed publicly on December 26, 2024, if not earlier.
The general or at least default consensus thus far is that while the CAC 6th gen aircraft will be too big for carrier operations, a carrier version of the SAC 6th gen fighter will emerge.
Obviously, we don't know exactly when that will happen, but it's reasonable to project that this will occur by 2035 considering the timelines of the J-20, J-35 and J-15 programs.
If that's the case, just how many navalized J-35s will enter service, especially with the J-15T in production, and the SAC 6th gen fighter "around the corner?"
Never mind the J-35/15.
Explain to me, in detail, the steps of baking the perfect kiwi & sardine pizza.