One of the unintended consequences of the PLAAF showing off this taxi test (which is still years in advance of actual full production of the aircraft) of the J-20 is that the incoming congress in the US, which is much more conservative, and will probably even get more so in 2012, may be moved to restore funding for more F-22s.
I agree that the seemingly accelerated introduction of the J-20 will evoke a defensive response/reaction from the United States defense establishment, with one likely response a consideration of re-starting F-22 production.
So, now, please explain to those of us that don't practice "
voodoo economics" precisely
how spending
more federal funds on an incredibly expensive product in what will surely be an inflationary financial environment qualifies as "
conservatism".
From your assessment, I can only logically interpret your use of the adjective
"conservative" as being referent to cultural ideologies and certainly not fiscal policies or practices.
Hell, maybe the United States can
borrow the money to finance the F-22 from China! Selling the PBC another
trillion dollars in US Treasuries would -
most certainly- put the United States in a dominant geoplitical position going forth.