J-20... The New Generation Fighter III

Status
Not open for further replies.
MiG-29

MiG-29

Banned Idiot
siegecrossbow said:
Just noticed that you posted the article on defencetalk too Blitz... wow was MIG upset...

One of my friends actually showed a USAF F-15 pilot the article and he had no bones to pick with it except that there were a few grammatical errors and found the basic premise plausible. He also showed it to Gambit on PDF who commended our efforts and agreed with some of the premises of the paper... (believe me it means a lot).
Click to expand...

interesting the same document is indiandefence but i never saw you gave a better counter argument, and by the way, that paper is 10 times much more proffessional than any thing i have seen here, see you in Indian defence, if you want to discuss it with me see you.

Conclusions
• Configuration characteristics
– large internal volume (i.e. munitions capacity)
– long range
– supercruise capability
• Optimized for use as a long-range interceptor
and air-to-surface attack platform
• Actual performance dependent upon engine
development

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Optimized for use as a long-range interceptor
and air-to-surface attack platform
 
Last edited:
MiG-29

MiG-29

Banned Idiot
kyanges said:
Who was arguing for what again? Was MiG29 supporting or discrediting the idea of LERXs in front of the J-20's canards? I know the discussion covered a lot more than this, but I'm just curious about what we "finally" have proof for.
Click to expand...

if you want to know my opinion in indian defence there are all the articles i posted and my opinions
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Blitzo

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
MiG-29 said:
if you want to know my opinion in indian defence there are all the articles i posted and my opinions
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Click to expand...

I thought over on defencetalk you said you weren't coming back to SDF? :(

If we want to know your opinion we have over a hundred pages to refer to...
And the article siege and no_name translated over on CeseDF wasn't meant to be professional, it was mean to be informative and from most people, the reception to most of the writing was positive. (I don't see exactly how the powerpoint you posted on defencetalk shows J-20 as a striker/interceptor either, we've made this clear time and time again).

(You know you can edit posts to add replies instead of having three consecutive posts, right?)
 
Last edited:
MiG-29

MiG-29

Banned Idiot
Bltizo said:
I thought over on defencetalk you said you weren't coming back to SDF? :(

If we want to know your opinion we have over a hundred pages to refer to...
And the article siege and no_name translated over on CeseDF wasn't meant to be professional, it was mean to be informative and from most people, the reception to most of the writing was positive. (I don't see exactly how the powerpoint you posted on defencetalk shows J-20 as a striker/interceptor either, we've made this clear time and time again).

(You know you can edit posts to add replies instead of having three consecutive posts, right?)
Click to expand...

i won`t post more here in that you are correct, i know this this forum is biased, this forum only good thing i like is the pictures, but aimarraul is basicly posting almost the same pictures in videos in indian defence if i will discuss topics with any of you it will be in fair ground here is not fair, it is pretty bias, and your article does not compare to this

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


if you want to discuss here is a fair ground at
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


see you have a good day
 
Blitzo

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
MiG-29 said:
i won`t post more here in that you are correct, i know this this forum is biased, this forum only good thing i like is the pictures, but aimarraul is basicly posting almost the same pictures in videos in indian defence if i will discuss topics with any of you it will be in fair ground here is not fair, it is pretty bias, and your article does not compare to this

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Click to expand...

I'm not sure there is ever a forum one can consider "fair ground".

But whatever, good riddance then.
 
G

getready

Senior Member
Turning the j-20 to a strike version seems abit ambitious at this stage. Does PLAAF have this kind of experience? I mean they just embarked on a new challenging journney with her first stealth fighter, i reckon better not to take detours right now.
 
Last edited:
Blitzo

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
getready said:
Mig29 is indian? I assumed he was russian. That kinda explains things
Click to expand...

I think we would be wise to not bring race into this :)

@Mig, of course the article siege and no_name doesn't compare to that slide show, it's infinitely better. Far easier to follow, gives good insight into the supposed development of the fighter and doesn't quote random numbers out of thin air as if it they were facts and then leading onto a seemingly irrelevant conclusion. :p
 
Last edited:
MiG-29

MiG-29

Banned Idiot
getready said:
Mig29 is indian? I assumed he was russian. That kinda explains things.

Turning the j-20 to a strike version seems abit ambitious at this stage. Does PLAAF have this kind of experience? I mean they just embarked on a new challenging journney with her first stealth fighter, i reckon better not to take detours right now.
Click to expand...

not indian at all, but if you want to know my ethnicity is Mexican, with family in Russia, Poland, Israel and of course Mexico and plenty of family in the US.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top