Mig, lets stick to the hard data, every one in the West recognizes that the Mig 15 was an outstanding A2A platform, superior firepower, climb, and turn rates, bested our best in the early Korean conflict, finally to be countered by the F-86, which found the Mig to be a handfull, but with superior tactics and training the F-86 became the dominant aircraft.
The F-4 was designed to employ air to air missles, it had no internal gun, it was heavy, and it did not like to turn, and yes the Mig 21, was a superior A2A platform, although hard data suggests that your kill ratio is just KRAP.
Propaganda will get you killed, especially if you believe some of the nonsense you quote, and not everybody lies, in fact the poor showing in Vietnam, spawned the F-15, and later the ATF. The F-15 is quite capable even today, and would likely prove a difficult "kill" for any of the above listed competition, and to date the J-20 and T-50 have yet to enter production and are not a factor. In fact good money says the F-15 will defeat all of the above, due to superior training, tactics, avionics,and weapons. That many F-15 pilots chose to stay with it, says more good about the Eagle, than it does negative about the Raptor. Thats why I would be very carefull about your sources, quoting them reflects on your own credibility.
