AFAIK, trailing edge is rarely changed during manouvers, except for pure deltas which don't have any other options, because it screws up the lift. That is precisely why pure deltas have fairly bad sustained turn rates - because their lift keeps dropping during the turn as their control surfaces screw up the airflow over the wing. delta canards and conventional layout planes don't need to do that.
What about aircraft like the F-15 that doesn't have leading edge control surfaces?
No it does not, the F-15 was design as a high thrust to weight loading low wing loading fighter, there are parts of the flight envelop where the F-15 surpasses MiG-29 and Su-27 specially in the transonic area around Mach 0.9-1.1
What about aircraft like the F-15 that doesn't have leading edge control surfaces?
the maximum lift config would probably look like this (take off and landing config) :
same like siege, also wonder what the trailing edge is (not) doing
can't get my head around this picture, the more i look at it the more confusing
One thing I don't understand is why they aren't using the rear control surfaces to do anything during a turn.
No it does not, the F-15 was design as a high thrust to weight loading low wing loading fighter, there are parts of the flight envelop where the F-15 surpasses MiG-29 and Su-27 specially in the transonic area around Mach 0.9-1.1
leading edge devices only provides higher stall alpha, doesn't provide a high lift at a given alpha. nor does it provide the pitching moment.
trailing edge elevarons (elevator-and-aileron) on a pure delta provides pitching moment by dumping lift at outer edge of the large delta, which happens to change pitching moment. because out board lift dump moved the total center of pressure fwd.
anyways all of you are wrong
as for using elevarons AND canard. dassault rafale uses it but not the main pitching control, partly because its canard are sized pretty... conservatively. for a large canard aircraft like J-10/20/Typhoon/Gripen there is really no need to use for pitch because the canard is big enough. but some do uses it for one reason or the other (Gripen for example...as the famous and widely published Pilot-induced-oscillation or PIO event shows the inner workings of Gripen's control law. anyways, way beyond the realms of amature forum boys but into the realm of pros )
by itself the 1st order function of canard is nothing but a fwd pitch moment device...just like a elevator but fwd of cg.
---------- Post added at 09:23 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:18 PM ----------
The 2nd picture is a momentary picture.
could simply be that...
The pilot could be pulling back on the stick to ask for more alphas(Gs) but Flight COntrol System is deflecting the canard surface down to arrest the extra pitch rate so the airplane don't overshoot its maximum alpha and stall.
all in day's of work of a full authority flight control law.
I meant to ask how the F-15 turns when it doesn't have leading edge control surfaces. Does it use the horizontal stabilizers instead?