One thing I don't understand is why they aren't using the rear control surfaces to do anything during a turn.
My guess is the air frame is generating so much lift it doesn't need to?
One thing I don't understand is why they aren't using the rear control surfaces to do anything during a turn.
You know , I did had a conversation once with a fellow who knows a lot about Rafale he more or less explain me why Rafale has that configuration , after extensive analysis of both Rafale and Eurofighter we could see Rafale was the better dogfighter , if you mean the Swiss report about Rafale and Eurofighter fighter bid i can posted to you again.Thats true mig, but I think A mans paper is also talking mostly about a one piece aluminum alloy wing/fuselage juncture, the point being that there are no stressors from rivets/bonding and hence greator strength since it is all one piece and the skin is cleaner. I think it was Dr. Song that mentioned that the canard needed to be on the same plane as the aero dynamic forward fuselage strakes, as you noted earlier, the XB-70 had distant coupled canards and the main wing was also in the delta configuration. So while we have seen most of these tricks, I think you would agree that the J-20 presents a very nice blending of more than we would normally see on one aircraft. Could you post that link to the 1991 european study again?
Today's video embedded for your convenience once again:
[video=youtube;lKq1fZou_1Y]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lKq1fZou_1Y&feature=plcp&context=C4408bbdVDvjVQa1PpcFPH2_yNOJNNTOkdXV0fnzdA cFrcLVUZsuY%3D[/video]
Workers leveled a dirt mound that J-20 watchers usually stand on when they take pictures of the aircraft.
My guess is the air frame is generating so much lift it doesn't need to?
Watchers can always bring a step ladder next time.
They Are Taking Down The "Best Viewing Spot!"
My guess is the air frame is generating so much lift it doesn't need to?
Player have you found any more anecdotal evidence of more aircraft some where else, I don't really have any sources, and I think some of us on here suspect there are more than one, but I have yet to see any conclusive evidence of a little sister to 2001?
QUOTE]
Well, I don't have anything more worthy of being evidence to that than what I have forworded long time ago: Some big shrimps have insisited that there are 6 to 7 J-20's simultaneously doing deifferent sets of test. I am about the only person sort of believing this here. Others may believe that there are two (one running the static tests), but won't go beyond that before seeing any photos in which a bunch of J-20's sit together or J20's with different numbers on them...
Well, I don't have anything more worthy of being evidence to that than what I have forworded long time ago: Some big shrimps have insisited that there are 6 to 7 J-20's simultaneously doing deifferent sets of test. I am about the only person sort of believing this here. Others may believe that there are two (one running the static tests), but won't go beyond that before seeing any photos in which a bunch of J-20's sit together or J20's with different numbers on them...