J-20... The New Generation Fighter III

Status
Not open for further replies.

HKSDU

Junior Member
Safety isn't the issue for canopies. Doesn't matter whether if the canopy is one-piece or two-piece, as soon as the bird strikes, it will break. That's a golden rule. Unless you put tank armour on the canopy, it won't be much good.
Plus, who said two-piece canopies are stronger? Think of the canopy as an arched bridge. Do you guys think a half arch is stronger or a full arch is stronger?

And as for F-2 being a low altitude fighter, that's a joke. Even low flying fighters fly at least few hundred meters above the ground/sea level, that is much higher than most birds would fly at. The only time they descend to low altitude is during attack maneuvers or landings. Do you guys really think that a highly trained pilot, worth about 25-50 million dollars, would be stupid enough to not spot a group of birds before making the maneuver? It is a common sense, most bird strikes occur at takeoff and landing. These are almost impossible to avoid for pilots and they are not in their control.

In conclusion, there is no strong proof that single piece canopies are stronger, and even if they are, how often would they be hit? Higher probability than normal planes?

The bridge analogy doesn't work in this case. An arch bridge is strong when the dead load or live load is acting vertically down due to gravity at a gradual rate. A bird strike comes horizontally impacting kinetic energy at immense speed (due to the fighter moving towards the bird). Stationary structural analysis is completely different to material structural analysis design.
 

MiG-29

Banned Idiot
So use 13.46 meters without the probe to do the estimate? Go for it. I've done enough of them, so getting kind of sick of these.

EDIT: Decided to do the estimate in the end. 20.2 meters.

it is not my estimate, russian sources and books by Yefim Gordom, claim it measures without probe 13.46, so yeah probably the J-20 is around 20.2


meters, it just simply looks longer because the nacelles are larger than F-22

see

Модификация МиГ-21Ф-13
Размах крыла, м 7.15 wing span
Длина, м 13.46 length





Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



however if this is correct the J-20 is almost 20.9

Technical data and flying characteristics of the J-7 / F-7


In the table below each generations of the J-7 / F-7 is represented by one version too.

Parameter I/A M III MG FT-7
Length w/o pitot tube (m) 13,46 13,95 14,10 13,95 13,46




Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Last edited:

Red___Sword

Junior Member
Yes, thank you Mig-29 and challenger and whoever one-liner-web-digger alike, thanks to your throw-ups that SDF members have began another wave of crusade to find the holy-Sangreal: The J-20's size.

One day, when the actual J-20 enters service, the size of it is NOT something "I have to kill you after tell you" stuff, and the only differences knowing it (eye bull it) between THEN and NOW - is like the difference one took a three night queue ups, to get THE FIRST iphone 5 - and one walks in a store to buy it on the spot, some days later.

So cheer up guys, China revealed a functioning "Underground Great Wall" nuclear 2nd strike program to the average Joes and Zhangs by boardcasting it on TV, China WILL tell you the B-W-H dimension of the "4th Princess" (If you haven't hear this name yet, that's the first nickname for J-20 ever around)
 

paintgun

Senior Member
we all certainly don't enjoy pointless discussion going in circles, but the picture was indeed interesting (for me) and gives us the best reference objects so far
the same position of camera, the same setting/lens when taking the photos, the same background building, even almost the same position of the aircrafts passing by, hence little perspective error, maybe the only deviation would be the position of the aircraft relative to the centre line of the tarmac

which for now, leads us to the assumption that J-20 is much closer to the 20m figure, rather than the 22m figure

for me that's a good find
 

latenlazy

Brigadier
it is not my estimate, russian sources and books by Yefim Gordom, claim it measures without probe 13.46, so yeah probably the J-20 is around 20.2


meters, it just simply looks longer because the nacelles are larger than F-22

see

Модификация МиГ-21Ф-13
Размах крыла, м 7.15 wing span
Длина, м 13.46 length





Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



however if this is correct the J-20 is almost 20.9

Technical data and flying characteristics of the J-7 / F-7


In the table below each generations of the J-7 / F-7 is represented by one version too.

Parameter I/A M III MG FT-7
Length w/o pitot tube (m) 13,46 13,95 14,10 13,95 13,46




Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

*rollseyes* Couldn't just leave it at that could we.

I just noticed it says J-7E on the tail, so we at least know it's the E variant.

EDIT:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Annddd found. It says 13.46 meters.

This isn't helping huh?

EDIT2: The good news is I've done some research, and the JF-17 figure we should be using is 14.97 meters.
 
Last edited:

MiG-29

Banned Idiot
*rollseyes* Couldn't just leave it at that could we.

I just noticed it says J-7E on the tail, so we at least know it's the E variant.

EDIT:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Annddd found. It says 13.46 meters.

This isn't helping huh?

EDIT2: The good news is I've done some research, and the JF-17 figure we should be using is 14.97 meters.

those wikipedia numbers do not make sense, the original J-7 were 13.46 like the MiG-21-13, however it gives higher numbers, but yeah the most likely is J-20 is between 20.2-20.9 meters.
 

latenlazy

Brigadier
those wikipedia numbers do not make sense, the original J-7 were 13.46 like the MiG-21-13, however it gives higher numbers, but yeah the most likely is J-20 is between 20.2-20.9 meters.

Check out my last post in keypub. I'm pretty sure those wiki numbers are wrong. On the other hand, if you measured the length of the J-7 from the nose to the tail plane, your J-7 is too short. It's length is from the nose to the vertical tail (that protrudes) out a bit. Using both the 14.885 figure with probe and 13.95 figure without probe I got something around 20.5 meters. I compared these measurements with potential measures of the JF-17 and found a cluster of values around 20.5.
 

MiG-29

Banned Idiot
Check out my last post in keypub. I'm pretty sure those wiki numbers are wrong. On the other hand, if you measured the length of the J-7 from the nose to the tail plane, your J-7 is too short. It's length is from the nose to the vertical tail (that protrudes) out a bit. Using both the 14.885 figure with probe and 13.95 figure without probe I got something around 20.5 meters. I compared these measurements with potential measures of the JF-17 and found a cluster of values around 20.5.

i did use the vertical tail, but the matter rest on the J-7, because is an aircraft pretty well known, in the West, in Russia.

Time will tell its real size but on the meantime i think it is between 20.2 to 20.9, the relation J-7/J-20 is roughly 1:1.5 in size and it will change little so using 13.46 or 13.95 only adds 70cm not a lot, i always thought it was between 20.5-21.5 meters but now i see it is 20-21 meters but not more than 21, in fact i think 20.9 is the max and 20.2 its minimun, but its nacelles are at least 2-3 meters longer than F-22`s
 
Last edited:

latenlazy

Brigadier
i did use the vertical tail, but the matter rest on the J-7, because is an aircraft pretty well known, in the West, in Russia.

Time will tell its real size but on the meantime i think it is between 20.2 to 20.9, the relation J-7/J-20 is roughly 1:1.5 in size and it will change little so using 13.46 or 13.95 only adds 70cm not a lot, i always thought it was between 20.5-21.5 meters but now i see it is 20-21 meters but not more than 21, in fact i think 20.9 is the max and 20.2 its minimun, but its nacelles are at least 2-3 meters longer than F-22`s
They're probably half of that actually. keep in mind that in place of a usual engine shroud and nozzles, the 2D TVC nozzles look shorter. The tip of the TVC nozzles reach about halfway the length of the tail planes. That shouldn't be 3 meter difference, and is probably less than 2 meters.
 

MiG-29

Banned Idiot
They're probably half of that actually. keep in mind that in place of a usual engine shroud and nozzles, the 2D TVC nozzles look shorter. The tip of the TVC nozzles reach about halfway the length of the tail planes. That shouldn't be 3 meter difference, and is probably less than 2 meters.

do a pixel count of a F-22 and J-20, you will find the F-22`s nozzels and you will see from nose tip to nozzle tips is around 16.7 meters and J-20 is around 19.7 from nose to nozzles considering it measures 20.3 and around 20.3 meters if it measures 20.9 meters
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top