J-20 5th Generation Fighter VII

Status
Not open for further replies.

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
An Ultra large aperture array will require crazy amount of power. Sounds to me like a very theoretical simulation with very far off applications.
You do realize that it is an array of many sats instead of a single ultra large sat? Each individual sat is no more power demanding than any sat in the space today. Using an array is exactly the reason to solve the problem that you talk about.
 

Atomicfrog

Major
Registered Member
Is there any data on the maintenance of the J-20?
From what can be understood from the Finnish F-35 purchase contract is that the maintenance of the invisible "paint" of the aircraft is incredibly complex and expensive, I seem to remember that half of the contract was the refurbishment of Finnish airbases for the aircraft.
If you destroy these maintenance hangars you quickly degrade the F-35 of its greatest advantage, which is invisibility and in general what the whole aircraft depends on, which is a bit stupid if the war drags on and doesn't last just a few weeks ...
We don't have data of availability of J-20, we know that nearly half of F-35 stock are not in capacity of doing mission because of maintenance headache. In 2022, availability rates ranged from 54 percent for the F-35A and F-35B to 58 percent for the F-35C.

Would be awesome to have data on J-20.
 

Michaelsinodef

Senior Member
Registered Member
We don't have data of availability of J-20, we know that nearly half of F-35 stock are not in capacity of doing mission because of maintenance headache. In 2022, availability rates ranged from 54 percent for the F-35A and F-35B to 58 percent for the F-35C.

Would be awesome to have data on J-20.
Didn't we have some vague stuff or something that basically pointed out that availablity rates for PLAAF was all around better over the whole board?

Like I think I remember it as J-20 reaching 70-80%+?
 

TK3600

Major
Registered Member
Maintnence is not an issue because frankly 200 planes are nothing to country size of China. US is only struggling because it has much higher number and use them intensely for war. Of course China can maintain 1/4 of US number and using them half as intense. Or is 1/8 maintnence capacity of US too unbelievable?
 

TK3600

Major
Registered Member
It was in Patch’s now deleted video. Yes I recall hearing a ridiculously high number for availability rate.
Speaking of Patch, I am inclined to believe the recent Discord leak is legit. The information reported may very well be fake and edited, but there was a legitimate leak. Maybe this is why Patch is no longer posting in public. There must have been an internal crack down on people with clearance posting on internet, and Patch is one of those with clearance.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top