Twin seater variant is not the same thing.View attachment 103789
Wait a minute, now im confused. Did they already implement this hump on j20s?
Twin seater variant is not the same thing.View attachment 103789
Wait a minute, now im confused. Did they already implement this hump on j20s?
which means in short future there could be a 2061 to integrate all these changes in airframe and power plant?Well it’s a brand new airframe with new design changes. Only makes sense to fit it with existing and proven power plants to reduce risks. Testing new engines is usually a job left to dedicated testbeds, so the way I see it CAC’s mounting ws10 on this new jet because that’s what they have available and what can actually be used in production right now.
edit: if they’re changing this much it makes sense for this new design to be “for ws15”. However since ws15 as far as we know is still undergoing testing and not near production, it also makes sense for them to go forward with the design changes and stick ws10 on there for the time being while they wait for ws15 to enter production.
What’s most likely to happen if the 205X series is meant for the J-20 version with the WS-15 is that 2051 will get the new engines at some point or we will see a 2052.which means in short future there could be a 2061 to integrate all these changes in airframe and power plant?
No, a local person says that 2041 should be in Yanliang now.Oh duh. Just occurred to me that they skipped 2041 because superstition.
So what is 2041 for specifically?No, a local person says that 2041 should be in Yanliang now.
2041 is also undergoing trials with probable WS-15 ..So what is 2041 for specifically?
Why would they make both a 204x series and a 205X series before either are in production?2041 is also undergoing trials with probable WS-15 ..
WS-15 is awaiting for type certification in Yanliang, Shanxi.
i think most likely 2 different and independent feature packages developed in parallel, to be merged together in futureWhy would they make both a 204x series and a 205X series before either are in production?
I share the same thoughts....im not buying the whole drag performance improvisation with a back hump ROFL. Both F35 and J35 did it mainly because for extended combat radius, and they need to maximize all the internal fuel storage capacity to achieve that.
Can’t speak for F35 but J-35’s spine change is at least in a large part due to aerodynamic gains. Last summer there was a paper that talked about the aerodynamic changes on the J35 in some detail, and regarding the spine it did say that drag reduction by filling up low-pressure areas is the main cause for the design change.
Check here (J-XY - maybe J-35 - next generation carrier-borne fighter) for the paper in question, part 3.1 is about the canopy redesign.
Don't forget the 2004.Four sounds like death.