J-20 5th Generation Fighter VII

Status
Not open for further replies.

Fedupwithlies

Junior Member
Registered Member
It's this sentence otherwise I would have the same understanding as you:

"I can't think of any folks who have access to the information I'm basing my thoughts on the matter on, who also consider the J-20 as a platform to be superior in sheer A2A capability-set."

This "also" (along with the negative at the beginning of the sentence) sounds like he believes the J-20 to be better in A2A than F-22. I'm trying to get clarity on what he's saying.
Given the context of the rest of the thread, I think that's just unfortunate and awkward phrasing.
 

Mohsin77

Senior Member
Registered Member
Not saying they are even but saying that there are cracks to America's propaganda that the Raptor is an alien bird
You know next to nothing about the platform.
So... specs or it didn't happen.


You're all nuts.

This whole thing started when a kid yelled that admiring the Raptor is like "jerking off to an old granny photo."

All I said was that the Raptor should be given due respect, and that's something all 3 of you actually agree with, as even Manqiangrexue and ZeEa5KPul know that it's a brilliant machine.

This has nothing to do with whether the Raptor is still the best, or how it compares to the J-20. No one, not even Patchwork would have all the details to make such comparisons concrete (at best they would be estimates), as both sides of the equation are highly classified.

Therefore, this is all OT and doesn't even belong on this thread, starting with the guy who's talking about jerking off to grannies !
 
Last edited:

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
If this has been good faith engagement from you,
Just for the last post, not the first few.
I worry for those subjected to your less agreeable side.
They usually quit the forum.
No wtf lol, how hard is that sentence to parse? We'll do it together

>I can't think of any folks who have access to the information I'm basing my thoughts on the matter on
(Meaning I do not know of anybody who has the information that I have)
>who also consider the J-20 as a platform to be superior in sheer A2A capability-set.
(Meaning of those people who have access to the information that I have, none to my knowledge consider the J-20 a superior platform in sheer A2A)

It's... it's really not hard man. I'm not sure how to communicate this stuff if the information bottleneck is literally your reading comprehension. I'm not even trying to be mean right now, like, if you literally cannot understand the sentences I'm writing at a grammatical level, I'm not sure how productive this even *can* be.
Well, if your reading comprehension was so awesome, you'd see that you worded it in a way that can be interpreted to mean the opposite of what you intended. If I say, "I can't think of anyone else who ate at Taco Bell who also got sick." It very much can mean that they all didn't get sick and I did. Your sentence, aside from you intended meaning, also can mean that you dissented from your colleagues in their opinion. If you wanted to write your sentence in an unambiguous way, you could just take out the "also."

I just wanted you to clarify that because it was my first interpretation.
No, because as I just said, you have uh... incorrectly interpreted my previous sentence somehow lol.
The somehow is because you worded it in an ambiguous way. But that's fine now.
no bro they actually pay quite well for that sort of thing, claim your govbux!
I don't sell my soul to the devil for any amount.
Or perhaps your understanding of the US classification system, and/or the material I'm discussing isn't quite as good as you seem to think it is.
Ok, if it's not considered an intelligence breach in the US for a (former) intelligence analyst to publish his and his colleague's conclusions based on classified data on the internet, that's cool with me.
No not really. If your first impression of me is wrong, then you are wrong. It's as simple as that lol.


I'm not asking you to do a background check, but I *am* saying your portrayal of me as a liar, and forming the basis of your position on that portrayal is more than a little senseless when all it takes is a quick check through my profile to see I at least know what I'm talking about.
And how is it proven that you know what you are talking about or that your career was as you said it is? What did you say in your previous posts would prove it other than your claims which are already made in this thread?
No, I'm saying that YOU don't know enough to conclude anything.
Ok, I see and now I'm saying that the privileged information that you think is correct, very well may not be, as we have seen in public examples of US intelligence's previous gaffs on the J-20.
 
Last edited:

ZeEa5KPul

Colonel
Registered Member
Also, what a silly position to take when you know neither what we know, nor whether or not they're correct
Of course it's not silly, it's the correct position to take. You can believe that statement is true or its negation, which put explicitly states that the US government knows nearly everything or absolutely everything about the J-20. I find that unlikely just on prior probability. All I know about the American intelligence apparatus is what it presents to the public, and what it's presented has been laughably wrong, e.g. the assessment of the J-20's readiness and the whopper that was WMDs in Iraq.
Eh. I don't think the engines contribute all that much lol. I personally don't weigh them as a decisive factor, other than perhaps in ACM, where other traits leave it more to pilot competency and luck than sheerly to the aircraft's kinematics when you get as sharp as today's BFM environment is. Like yeah if it were from a merge, in a vacuum, it'd count for a lot more - but typical WVR engagements don't occur in that manner.
Unless you're willing to be more specific, you've knocked out the only supporting strut a reasonable person could give your argument. The J-20 is a newer platform built from the ground up with the purpose of taking on the F-22, from what's visible externally the J-20 has a richer sensor suite (the F-22 doesn't even have an IRST), the program is far more active than the F-22, China's air combat munitions are at or exceeding the level of the US (does the US have AAMs with dual pulse motors like the PL-15? Does the F-22 field the Meteor?). I don't think the F-22's radar can do anything the J-20's cannot (CETC is perfectly capable of producing these electronics at the highest level), or at the very least that it has a trick up its sleeve that will turn the fight in its favour consistently. I'm sure you don't buy the crap that canards ruin RCS or the J-20 isn't VLO.

The only thing I can unreservedly give the F-22 is the engines. If you say that doesn't matter then what gives the F-22 the edge?
Ehhh no not really lol. I do my absolute best not to touch mission systems - other than what's publicly available. Unfortunately, a lot of what makes and breaks aircraft in these kinds of roles are very very much not in the publicly-available information sphere lol.
From how cagey you're being, I'm going to guess that this has something to do with some radar optimization the F-22 has (the "trick" I referred to in the preceding paragraph). Cool, at some point in the future - if it hasn't already happened - CETC writes a firmware upgrade and hey, wouldn't ya know it, the J-20's got some tricks of its own.
Unfortunately, unless you're willing to go out and kill that specific catbox yourself (I encourage it), you're just never ever going to know about some of these things
I'm afraid I don't get the idiom.
 

ZeEa5KPul

Colonel
Registered Member
You're all nuts.
You're just now getting this?
This whole thing started when a kid yelled that admiring the Raptor is like "jerking off to an old granny photo."
It began as a typical day at SDF...
This has nothing to do with whether the Raptor is still the best, or how it compares to the J-20. No one, not even Patchwork would have all the details to make such comparisons concrete (at best they would be estimates), as both sides of the equation are highly classified.
My position exactly. He seems confident that the J-20 is inferior to the F-22 at air combat, even if it gets the WS-15. Since I give his opinion a lot more weight than the typical rando, I want to know the basis for his judgement. "Trust me, bro" doesn't do it for me, even from someone like him.

Still, from what he's written (and what he dismissed), I think I know more about this than I did.
Therefore, this is all OT and doesn't even belong on this thread, starting with the guy who's talking about jerking off to grannies !
Welcome to SDF, I'm sure you'll have a great time here.
 

dasCKD

New Member
Registered Member
Of course it's not silly, it's the correct position to take. You can believe that statement is true or its negation, which put explicitly states that the US government knows nearly everything or absolutely everything about the J-20. I find that unlikely just on prior probability. All I know about the American intelligence apparatus is what it presents to the public, and what it's presented has been laughably wrong, e.g. the assessment of the J-20's readiness and the whopper that was WMDs in Iraq.
Okay, I have no idea what the evaluations the US DoD has published on the J-20, but using the WMD example is absurd on its face. That isn't a mistake on the IC's part, that is a politically fabricated fiction created to build concensus in the American, and more broadly the American-aligned, public so that they could support the war in Iraq. That wasn't a mistake, it was a lie. To present that as an example of the ineptitude of the American IC is laughable.
 
Last edited:

Mohsin77

Senior Member
Registered Member
It began as a typical day at SDF...

I know rite lolz


My position exactly. He seems confident that the J-20 is inferior to the F-22 at air combat, even if it gets the WS-15. Since I give his opinion a lot more weight than the typical rando, I want to know the basis for his judgement. "Trust me, bro" doesn't do it for me, even from someone like him.

Well, he's confident because that's his actual job. However, the conclusions his team has compiled would be estimates based on the intel they've gathered on the J-20 via espionage and analysis. Still, no one on his team would seriously claim they know 100% that all their intel is correct. But at least he would have verified data on the F-22, so he has more data on this than us.

Either way, platform vs platform debates aren't allowed on this thread, are they? Nor do they matter that much in the grand scheme of things, because what matters more is platform employment in a system vs system game.

.... All I'm really saying is that admiring raptors is NOT like jerking off to grandmas !!
 

Fedupwithlies

Junior Member
Registered Member
Yes.

Typically when it comes to conclusions reached through an extensive knowledge of classified mission systems, ttps, threat system evaluations, concepts of operation and employment, and a generalized understanding of airpower at a deeper level than anybody on here seems to even come near... it's a didactic for a reason.

As a matter of fact, no, I am not going to start spilling all of the classified elements that inform my position on the matter; and if you keep pestering for that sort of information, I won't be doing much of anything on here.

I consider keeping my clearance to be a touch more important than trying to help internet randoms learn about how operational level warfighting works.
Bummer.

You sure you don't want to leak some classified documents to us? At this rate we're going to be less informed than the Warthunder forums.

Oh well, I guess we'll have to wait for Gaijin to release the F-22 in-game to get the good stuff.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top