J-20 5th Generation Fighter VII

Status
Not open for further replies.

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
My expectation is opposite of yours for the reason that the stall condition is very much related to the drag coefficient i.e how fast drag increases with AOA. The high Alpha capability of the J-20 gives the aircraft a wider range of AOA to go through as the turbulent flow increases causing the increase in drag and finally the stalling.

I recall that the WS-10 powered J-20 was timed to have a STR of 18 degrees/ sec during some demo flight. Someone here even commented about it a while ago.

Yes, I commented on it during Zhuhai Airshow 2021. The difference in STR between WS-10C and AL-31 was very obvious.

 
Last edited:

Quickie

Colonel
Don't get what you're trying to say here, elaborate?



18degree/s if true makes a decent lower bound of J-20's abilities but it doesn't settles it vs F-22. Anyhow I'd be very happy to be proven wrong if there is evidence.

What I basically meant was you want your drag force to increase as little and as slow as possible as the AOA increases so as to achieve a better lift-to-drag ratio.

18degree/s if true makes a decent lower bound of J-20's abilities but it doesn't settles it vs F-22. Anyhow I'd be very happy to be proven wrong if there is evidence.

It's really about hard evidence. So far I have only seen F-22 doing about the same STR in the videos that I have seen.
 
Last edited:

enroger

Junior Member
Registered Member
What I basically meant was you want your drag force to increase as little and as slow as possible as the AOA increases so as to achieve a better lift-to-drag ratio.

True, that's what I want to point to a few posts back, the paper that was posted said nothing about J-20's drag characteristics, it's a bit of an unknown so we can't say anything about J-20 STR performance based on that paper alone.

It's really about hard evidence. So far I have only seen F-22 doing about the same STR in the videos that I have seen.

Fair enough
 

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
Even Vipers can splash Raptors in DACT depending on the many variables. No one (including yourself) would seriously claim the Eurofighter is in the same class as the Raptor. So this is a moot point.
Not saying they are even but saying that there are cracks to America's propaganda that the Raptor is an alien bird that's best at everything, can out-maneuver a helicopter, etc...
You're using the same bad argument that many Americans use against China's military.
But I'm not coming to the same conclusion. Americans are trying to conclude that if something is unproven then it's garbage. I'm saying that if it's unproven, don't assume it's the best or that it puts you at a disadvantage no matter what the enemy tells you or wants you to think. I've never concluded that J-20 was superior or inferior to a Raptor though I have my speculations about how they compare in various aspects.
If I go to Italy and admire the aqueducts, am I "perpetuating the mythical pedestal" of Rome's propaganda?

Or am I admiring the kool stuff yet another empire built at its peak, before stupidity caused its inevitable collapse?

(hint: it's the latter.)
Well that's very much fine as long as there is no misunderstanding. Both underestimating and overestimating your enemy can be equally deadly mistakes and I think that although the Chinese are generally meticulous and conserved, not prone to underestimation, we need to be careful not to make the opposite error either.
 

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Some illustrations showing the advantage of rolling at high AOA.

hX2ZQYi.gif


KDQyIsr.gif


QZZjRxu.gif


The motion essentially merges a roll with a turn. You have a 25-30 degree head start in nose direction change compared with rolling along the aircraft's axis.
 

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
You know next to nothing about the platform. I don't say this to demean you, but there seems to be a weird trend of assuming lots of stuff about highly HIGHLY classified platforms based on internet speculation. Please don't.
You've confused me with someone else making up numbers. I'm the one saying that we don't know enough about J-20, F-22 or any other 5th gen to be trying to analyze one over the other. I said that in exercise, the Raptor didn't always come out on top in certain envelopes against 4th gens, which is fact. And I certainly wouldn't assume an edge for the Raptor built to counter 4th gen platforms with all rival platforms built to counter it.
 

ZeEa5KPul

Colonel
Registered Member
You know next to nothing about the platform. I don't say this to demean you, but there seems to be a weird trend of assuming lots of stuff about highly HIGHLY classified platforms based on internet speculation. Please don't.
It's true that we don't know, but that's why we don't believe the hype. The point he's making is just because we don't know the Raptor's performance parameters doesn't mean we should buy that it redefines physics.

So... specs or it didn't happen.
 

tankphobia

Senior Member
Registered Member
With all these discussion about flight performance, it seems to be only really relevant when the planes enter dog fighting range which is a big no no in modern air doctrine, I believe that the most important aspect for any 5th gen aircraft is frontal RCS, radar, range and sensor fusion , everything else including dog fighting should be set aside as duels would occur far beyond visual range, so there's no need to get too hung up on the flight performance between f-22 and J-20, only supercruise is important as it means faster time to intercept and longer legs.
 

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Only midwits without a clue are making fantastical claims about it being this magical invincible aircraft.

In reality, as someone familiar with F-22 mission systems, it's a fantastic aircraft and still the most tactically capable air to air platform out there, with the only rival even in the same ballpark being the J-20, or the F-35. Just because this is true does not make those other, more fantastical, claims true.

You saying you "don't believe the hype" because you don't know is a bit like me saying I don't believe you're well endowed because I haven't seen what's in your pants. Both are kind of silly premises to make either conclusion from.


I'm certainly on board with that sentiment, but you were speaking about how there are "cracks in America's propaganda that the Raptor is an alien bird that's best at everything, can out-maneuver a helicopter, etc..." when those are hardly the US's position on the platform, and even if it were, I can't think of any publicly available "cracks" in the tactical capabilities of the aircraft which would lend credence to or detract from those claims.

The aircraft and it's associated sensors, data processing, signature management, and other major factors are all but a black box to most if not all the folks on here, yet I still see many trying to make claims about the performance, capability-set (or lack-thereof), and/or comparative standing of the platform as a whole.

Yes. There are capabilities of the Raptor not displayed to the public. Despite its age it is a very potent platform, otherwise Japan and Israel wouldn't have wanted to import it (but were rejected for national security purposes).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top