Only midwits without a clue are making fantastical claims about it being this magical invincible aircraft.
In reality, as someone familiar with F-22 mission systems, it's a fantastic aircraft and still the most tactically capable air to air platform out there, with the only rival even in the same ballpark being the J-20, or the F-35. Just because this is true does not make those other, more fantastical, claims true.
You saying you "don't believe the hype" because you don't know is a bit like me saying I don't believe you're well endowed because I haven't seen what's in your pants. Both are kind of silly premises to make either conclusion from.
I'm certainly on board with that sentiment, but you were speaking about how there are "cracks in America's propaganda that the Raptor is an alien bird that's best at everything, can out-maneuver a helicopter, etc..." when those are hardly the US's position on the platform, and even if it were, I can't think of any publicly available "cracks" in the tactical capabilities of the aircraft which would lend credence to or detract from those claims.
The aircraft and it's associated sensors, data processing, signature management, and other major factors are all but a black box to most if not all the folks on here, yet I still see many trying to make claims about the performance, capability-set (or lack-thereof), and/or comparative standing of the platform as a whole.