J-20 5th Generation Fighter VII

Status
Not open for further replies.

AndrewS

Brigadier
Registered Member
Just to confirm, those procurement costs include development costs spread across the total airframes bought/planned?

No, they're the approximate flyaway costs for each airframe

Development costs are better listed alongside, otherwise it gets really confusing
 

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
When I said we've been given visual hints I'm referring to stuff like this although it is extremely unofficial (the below image showing integrated UCAVs).

View attachment 79162

and the constant chatter about Dark Sword being the UCAV wingman to PLAAF manned fighters.



The video I shared has the pilot saying exactly this. I'm just sharing the video. I'm not here saying Dark Sword is an active, in service UCAV in PLAAF. They will not show images until the thing has been trained up. This isn't a prototype 2001 moment.

There have been plenty of unofficial chatter about this for about a decade now. No one thought the 2013 flying prototype of Sharp Sword would result in GJ-11. When GJ-11 was revealed in 2019, it was already in service. I would expect the Dark Sword UCAV to only be revealed after it has been in active service.

These following images are from between 2015 and 2018 iirc.

View attachment 79163


View attachment 79164

View attachment 79165


View attachment 79166

Out of these real, controlled leaks and very intentional ones at that if you look closely. We can't say it is in service and that isn't what I'm saying. Just wanted to share the video of a PLAAF pilot saying "I can go out alone and take four UCAVs into combat and that improves my situational awareness and combat effectiveness".

This is interesting to me because it's the first time we've had a state media report on this with a PLAAF J-20 pilot saying this directly in no uncertain terms. He even suggests J-20 single seater from his choice of words although there is definite reason to be uncertain about this aspect since J-20S is a thing and is clearly intended to be for commanding and integrating with UCAVs.

The UCAVs/UAVs he is referring to may or may not be Dark Sword or limited to the ones we know about.

Dark Sword has been shown at least as a program since so long ago I can't even remember was it 2009? Since then it is hinted at being a developed and worked on project until around 2018ish then pretty much silence. Now we see J-20S dual seater and have this official "leak" talking about a J-20 integrated with UCAVs.

View attachment 79167

Just wanted to add this CGI. All the models and available visual information on Dark Sword since 2009 (or whenever that first airshow model display showing the program) does seem to suggest this is the general layout and shape. It is one nice looking UCAV that's for sure. It's impressive enough for the Turks to create a surface visual copy with their MIUS program from 2020.

I would be more cautious.

We do not know if Dark Sword is definitively being developed. There is a possibility it is, but based on the current basis of rumours and evidence, I think the weighting is not definitive, say, in the same way that H-20 is confirmed, or the way in which J-XY was confirmed in the last few years.

Furthermore, what you wrote in your previous post was "
We have been given visual hints for some time that J-20 flies with and commands Dark Sword UCAVs.

IMO -- this is too much of an overreach.

The fan made CGIs are most certainly not a visual indicator.

What we do have, are rumours and allusions that J-20 is capable of commanding UAVs of some sort, and that is also within reasonable estimates as well given the way all nations are pursuing MUMT.
But we do not know what kind of UAVs that J-20s may be flying with.

To sum up:
1. We have some indicators that existing single seat J-20 is being developed with some capability to operate with, or command, some type of UAVs.
2. There are some rumours that Dark Sword may be an actively being developed project, but the weighting of evidence does not make it yet "confirmed".

IMO, I would argue -- at present we do not have visual hints of any value that J-20 has (or will) fly with or command Dark Sword UCAVs. That is simply on the basis of available evidence.

If we want to extrapolate and project out a bit, then I do agree that J-20 will certainly fly with and command UCAVs of some type or types (which may or may not include Dark Sword in its roster, if the Dark Sword project emerges). It is also possible that J-20 may have already begun to be tested with some high end UAVs/UCAVs as well.
The future of MUMT means that manned fighters will likely be intended to be capable of operating alongside and command multiple different types of high end UAVs and UCAVs.


However, it is much too far for us to suggest that we have any visual hints of J-20 and Dark Sword flying or operating together. Those CGIs definitely do not count.
 

latenlazy

Brigadier
I was going to say side weapon bay, but somehow the word “side” got lost

but anyway, my point is that, regardless of the the status, the aircraft frame structure should remain the same, so if the side bay is missing then it’s structure must have been changed, and is not likely to reverse back to the the side bay in the future
You can keep the internal structure and just put a panel over where you normally have to put in mechanisms for the door.
 

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
No side bays on the twin seater version.

View attachment 79151


Just so we have something to compare with -- this is why I'm saying everyone should perhaps hold their horses a bit to wait for a higher quality image.
As we can see, when an aircraft is in yellow primer and does not have the weapons bay edge treatment, you require a rather good quality image to identify the seam lines.

The images we have so far of the J-20S are not good enough to rule in or rule out the presence of side bays IMO.

highlight.jpg
 

Hendrik_2000

Lieutenant General
The idea of loyal wingman paired with J 20 is not so crazy after all according to PLAAF pilot
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

China’s military looks to J-20 jet-drone match-up for combat edge​

  • PLA pilot says unmanned aerial vehicles can do what humans cannot – endure extremes for long periods
  • US military tandem test hints at future warfare with mother ships keeping out of enemy range while drones fly into danger for intelligence and combat missions


Published: 12:00pm, 20 Nov, 2021


A PLA pilot has speculated on Chinese state media about a possible pairing of the J-20 stealth fighter with drones to improve the aircraft’s surveillance and warfare abilities. Photo: AP
China has again hinted at a potential pairing of its most advanced aircraft, the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, with
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
in a tandem strategy that would expand Beijing’s combat capabilities, according to state media.
“The future is a big era for drone development. Important questions are: what role should drones play in future battlefields, how to team up manned and unmanned vehicles, and what tactical goal can be achieved,” Chinese air force pilot Liu Qihong was quoted as saying about the J-20 in an interview with state broadcaster CCTV.

“If teamed with four drones during a mission, the manned vehicle can have a wider surveillance area and clearer sense of danger. What’s more, drones can overcome long endurance periods, high temperature and a lot of noise, which might become unbearable for human pilots.”
The CCTV report was shown as the air force marked its
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
on November 11.


The remarks on teaming the J-20 – an advanced fifth-generation fighter with stealth and supersonic cruise capabilities, also known as “Mighty Dragon” – with drones came weeks after the plane was shown at the latest
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
together with a drone, the GJ-11 “Sharp Sword”, a stealth unmanned combat aerial vehicle.


At that time Chinese authorities had not revealed plans to pair advanced fighter jets with drones, a field in which China’s technology leads, for military purposes. However, the positioning of the two aircraft prompted speculation online that the Chinese air force would marry manned and unmanned vehicles for future training exercises.

China is not the only country actively researching and practising manned-unmanned teaming, known as MUM-T.
EVERY SATU
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top