Oh I thought you meant there was a new image. I guess if it got taken down that means this is real and *something* is going on. Either the J-20 is getting a TVC WS-10 or its getting the WS-15. At the very least this confirms the J-20 is meant to have TVC. Best case scenario is that the WS-15 is not just indiscernible vaporware anymore.It got taken down.
Is there any reason why China does this? It's not like the Western intelligence agencies don't already know way more about China's military capabilities than badly photographed pictures allow them to. Just let Chinese netizens have their fun.
Well, actually, given how bad the US record on forecasting China’s military development has been, *and* given how China dismantled the CIA’s espionage ring in China a few years back...Is there any reason why China does this? It's not like the Western intelligence agencies don't already know way more about China's military capabilities than badly photographed pictures allow them to. Just let Chinese netizens have their fun.
How bad is US forecasting of China's military development? I doubt you have top secret clearance at the CIA or DIA. Nothing expressed in the US media is indicative of what the intelligence community knows.Well, actually, given how bad the US record on forecasting China’s military development has been, *and* given how China dismantled the CIA’s espionage ring in China a few years back...
You need to have high enough noise for disinformation campaign to work. If all leaks are true or all leaks and false then deliberate false leaks would be useless.Is there any reason why China does this? It's not like the Western intelligence agencies don't already know way more about China's military capabilities than badly photographed pictures allow them to. Just let Chinese netizens have their fun.
I would put it this way. We don’t need top secret clearance to know that the US’s ability to forecast China’s military developments is bad, because US policy towards China’s military developments frequently reflect slow-footed, even panicked reactions (remember all that hoopla with Bob Gates during the week of the J-20’s first flight?). Either the information isn’t being collected or it’s not informing policymaking. There’s a myth of US intelligence capabilities being omniscient that’s neither a reflection of present reality or historical record. Back during the Cold War US intelligence frequently found itself surprised by Soviet tech developments, sometimes to the point of overcorrection (as we saw with early assessments of the Mig-25), as it does today with China’s.How bad is US forecasting of China's military development? I doubt you have top secret clearance at the CIA or DIA. Nothing expressed in the US media is indicative of what the intelligence community knows.
Its very unlikely that the former is a reality.When I say "dimensions of intakes" I mean everything -- the DSI, the serpentine duct, the entire structure of the air intake from where the leading lip meets the air to where the duct joins the engines.
I remain unsure if they had designed and built all current J-20s with the entire air intake/duct structure to fit WS-15 from the outset, or whether the air intake/duct at present is designed around WS-10s and will require redesign for WS-15.
I wouldn't be surprised if the latter was true -- but I wouldn't also rule out the former.
Is there any reason why China does this? It's not like the Western intelligence agencies don't already know way more about China's military capabilities than badly photographed pictures allow them to. Just let Chinese netizens have their fun.