your words was which was an answer to
So I got the impression that you were talking about aircraft being spotted when sitting inside hanger.
good to know, please PM me if you can find something, I am very interested in it.SAR can spot aircraft after they have moved by spotting the changes in temperature on the ground under the aircraft compared to those around it. I remember seeing an image of an AFB with SAR in a programme while it was pretty easy to tell what planes used to park there from the heat shadow.
However, they only works if the plane had been parked there for some time, long enough for a detectable heat different to form and give enough resolution to ID an aircraft.
If you taxi straight to a shelter after landing, unless enemy SAR was overhead at that precise time, they will not be able to use this method to ID your aircraft.
The latest issue of ordnance industry science and tech told that there are more than 50 J-20 has already produced by CAC, and China will produce 200 to 300 J-20B that entered production this year.200-300 this year? Sounds like BS. How reputable is this magazine?
It is citing South China news, likely Minnie Chan lol.Via 52051.
The latest issue of ordnance industry science and tech told that there are more than 50 J-20 has already produced by CAC, and China will ultimately produce 200 to 300 J-20B that entered production this year.
Could some fluent Chinese members translate the other key points of this article. There looks to be quite a bit of content here and my Chinese is rudimentary .
View attachment 62745View attachment 62746View attachment 62747
Oh, for the love of... can anything be trusted?It is citing South China news, likely Minnie Chan lol.
The latest issue of ordnance industry science and tech told that there are more than 50 J-20 has already produced by CAC, and China will produce 200 to 300 J-20B that entered production this year.
This means China will ultimately produce 200 to 300 of the J-20B series that entered production this year, not produce 200 to 300 in a year (which would be impossible). I edited the translation of 52051 to make it more clearer.