J-20 5th Gen Fighter Thread VIII

Tomboy

Senior Member
Registered Member
Then I think the invincible stealth fighter in your mind would be some kind of stealth dogfighter?

Come on, even the F-22 has been locked on by F/A-18 or Rafale in close combat before.

Could you realize that the design criteria for the maneuverability of air superiority fighter jets should be aimed at launching medium-range air-to-air missiles rather than engaging in close-range tail-chasing dogfights?
F-22 definitely have superior kinematic performance until WS-15 become available even in terms of acceleration and supercruise performance which both are critical to BVR battles.
 

Mearex

Junior Member
Registered Member
Then I think the invincible stealth fighter in your mind would be some kind of stealth dogfighter?

Come on, even the F-22 has been locked on by F/A-18 or Rafale in close combat before.

Could you realize that the design criteria for the maneuverability of air superiority fighter jets should be aimed at launching medium-range air-to-air missiles rather than engaging in close-range tail-chasing dogfights?
where did I even mention dogfighting in my message...?
 

ougoah

Brigadier
Registered Member
Apparently those lock ons in training/exercises was with F-22 taking extra load in the form of external tanks. Either way, the fact that F-18s and Rafales have locked onto F-22 in WVR training/exercise is nothing to conclude anything on.

Can we all just note that modern air combat places lower emphasis on maneuverability in the flight regimes that fighters like Su-35, Su-57 and F-22 excel at mostly thanks to TVC.

Seriously, a Su-35 may be better at those airshow turns than a Typhoon or J-10C but I'd bet on the Typhoon and J-10C dominating over a Su-35 in actual combat. Flying so well doesn't translate into a better air superiority fighter.

F-22 has ancient sensors and software. Yes bits and bobs get upgraded but it's still going to be lacking as long as that radar is still from the 2000s, it's lacking any EOTS equivalent, computer architecture from the 1990s.

The US made a mistake to close down the F-22 line, preventing the F-22 lineage from adopting newer blocks and limiting it to piecemeal upgrades a la J-11B -> J-11BG which is not comparable to a J-16 even though a J-11BG is newer than early block J-16s.

The US considered the F-35 to be a better spend of funding and in the 1990s and 2000s it didn't appear they needed anything remotely close to F-22 and F-35 until 2040s and they knew they were going to have F-22/F-35 replacement generation by the 2040s at the latest anyway.
 

karaway

Just Hatched
Registered Member
F-22 definitely have superior kinematic performance until WS-15 become available even in terms of acceleration and supercruise performance which both are critical to BVR battles.
If you agree with this, that's great. The aerodynamic design of the J20 is more inclined towards supersonic speed, with a higher lift-to-drag ratio compared to the F22.

Therefore, even though the engine of the J20 is not as powerful as that of the F22, I believe that in terms of supersonic maneuverability, the disadvantage of the J20 will not be particularly significant.
Meanwhile, as a fighter aircraft from the 1990s, it lacked advanced data links, a complete situational awareness system, and outdated electronic equipment, which limited the F22's ability to fully utilize its exceptional supersonic performance.
 

sequ

Colonel
Registered Member
There is no way an F-22 can detect a J-20 at a 100km but a J-20 will, thanks to its dedicated IRST. Cue the much larger and more powerful radar and you got yourselves a firing solution without the Raptor knowing much.

And the J-20A does it all even better with upgraded radar, IRST, EW and a more potent AAM (PL-16).

Just like the J-10CE sealclubbed the Rafale, so will it be for the J-20 against the F-22/F-35.
 

OedoSoldier

New Member
Registered Member
So apparently 6 mass-produced J-20A (WS-15) have completed their maiden flights.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
View attachment 167033

The video appears to be on a loop, but according to the OP, it actually features six different J-20As.
According to a video from another post by the same OP, at least one J-20A (WS-15) has already been painted with stealth coating.

1766906920043.png

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

karaway

Just Hatched
Registered Member
where did I even mention dogfighting in my message...?
Generally speaking, TVC offers high angle-of-attack control performance during subsonic flight and provides flight moment balance during supersonic flight.

During the internal exercises of the PLA, the Su-35 equipped with TVC performed well in terms of instantaneous and stable turning rates. However, in close combat situations, it did not demonstrate an overwhelming advantage over the J-10.

Therefore, it is possible that after the improved model with increased thrust was introduced in WS15, the J20A/S might be equipped with TVC.
 

karaway

Just Hatched
Registered Member
In fact, I don't think the enemy's stealth fighter is the primary target for the J20.

The PLAAF believes that the most effective way to counter stealth fighter jets is distributed detection network.

Therefore, the J35 was regarded by the PLAAF as an important node in the anti-stealth network.

The J20 itself once fell into the anti-stealth trap set by the J16 aircraft fleet during a PLAAF exercise.

The main tactics of the PLAAF are to use the J20 to strike the enemy's key operational nodes, and to use a large number of J35s to form an anti-stealth network to protect their own air combat nodes.
 

qwerty3173

Junior Member
Registered Member
even with the new engines, are you confident that the J-20A is stealthier and has superior kinematic performance? Stealth coating effectiveness is largely gatekept, but from the shape alone, one can reasonably conclude that the F-22 is likely stealthier from the front and rear (I think Wang Haifeng or Yang Wei also said in a video posted on this forum that the J-20 is less stealthy from the rear). As for kinematics, the J-20 is likely at parity for supercruise performance, but without TVC, it's likely still not supermaneuverable like the F-22 or Su-57
F22 has these 2 gigantic tail fins that is sub-optimal for stealth regardless of direction, also caret type intakes are not as stealthy when viewed head-on. I would consider F22 to have better stealth when viewed from the rear and marginally worse stealth from front and the sides. Also, for kinematics, J20a with ws15 has the highest thrust-to-weight ratio on the planet, so yes, better kinematics.
 
Top