J-20 5th Gen Fighter Thread VIII

Wrought

Junior Member
Registered Member
(1)you often don't have a choice. It's a fighter, not a statuette in the end.
(2)j-16 is yet to show 16 missile capability. That's quite a lot.
(3)Normal LACMs aren't cheap themselves. Damage is often more expensive still.

I would hope and prefer they use rockets for that purpose, like USAF is doing. You can carry many more of them and each shot is much cheaper.

Proximity-fuzed APKWS IIs would seem equally well suited for employment in the air-to-air role. As noted, the Air Force announced in 2019 that it had conducted what it described as a proof-of-concept test of the laser-guided rockets against aerial targets, primarily as a potential lower-cost option for knocking down subsonic cruise missiles.

APKWS IIs are usable against drones, as well as subsonic cruise missiles, in the first place because those are relatively steady, non-reactionary, low-performance targets. The rockets are not dogfighting weapons.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

plawolf

Lieutenant General
Might be better to leave that to J-16. Also, how cheap are PL-15s if they can be used as anti-cruise missile fodder…

If the WS15 equipped J20 can supercruise with its beast-mode load-out, then that brings capabilities and options to the table the J16 cannot touch. It’s worth sacrificing some stealth for that, and it also speaks to the volumes of J20s in service that the PLAAF is starting to explore secondary and maybe even tertiary use cases for them.
 

Moonscape

Junior Member
Registered Member
If the WS15 equipped J20 can supercruise with its beast-mode load-out, then that brings capabilities and options to the table the J16 cannot touch. It’s worth sacrificing some stealth for that, and it also speaks to the volumes of J20s in service that the PLAAF is starting to explore secondary and maybe even tertiary use cases for them.

I'll laugh if the PLA ends up with many J-20s that they use them for ground attack.
 
Top