J-20 5th Gen Fighter Thread VIII

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Not only this ... it also features the J-20A's broader - more beak-like - radome and if indeed also using WS-15 engines, I think it's time to change the designation at least to J-20AS.

Only if they intended for the J-20S to enter service with WS-10C though. To the best of my knowledge that hasn’t happened yet?
 

Deino

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Only if they intended for the J-20S to enter service with WS-10C though. To the best of my knowledge that hasn’t happened yet?

Why? I thought the WS-10C powered regular J-20 is called just "J-20" and so a WS-10C-powered twin-seater would make sense as a J-20S.
Now with several changes akin to the J-20A - aka WS-15 engines, beak-like broader radome & other minor details - I think it should be called J-20AS.

Or do I miss something?
 

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Why? I thought the WS-10C powered regular J-20 is called just "J-20" and so a WS-10C-powered twin-seater would make sense as a J-20S.
Now with several changes akin to the J-20A - aka WS-15 engines, beak-like broader radome & other minor details - I think it should be called J-20AS.

Or do I miss something?

J-20S should just be J-20S because the WS-10C engine is just an interim measure? Aerodynamically it always shared commonality to J-20A before the latter was even revealed.

Let PLAAF be the judge I guess? We’ll know in a couple of years.
 
Top