J-20 5th Gen Fighter Thread VIII

lcloo

Captain
well, this paint scheme may indicate that this is one of the early batches. Photo is possibly from Zhuhai Airshow. This is obviously a photo taken in bright daylight, and edited to make it looked like at night.

The after-burner flames looked a bit funny in direction. Can we see that much flame in bright day light?

006ExVf5gy1hrp03ivov8j35dc3e2b2d.jpg
 
Last edited:

Nx4eu

Junior Member
Registered Member
well, this paint scheme may indicate that this is one of the early batches. Photo is possibly from Zhuhai Airshow. This is obviously a photo taken in bright daylight, and edited to make it looked like at night.

The after-burner flames looked a bit funny in direction. Can we see that much flame in bright day light?

View attachment 132504
This most definitely is a doctored photo. The whole thing just screamed fake to me especially with those weird afterburner angles. But the missing serrated edges also confused the hell out of me. GO0MSKRWwAEtyR8.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • WS-15.jpg
    WS-15.jpg
    125 KB · Views: 16

Nx4eu

Junior Member
Registered Member
How the hell you guys extrapolated any of this from a blurry photo is beyond me.
My apologies I will spend more time analyzing the photo and then presenting all my findings later. I was too quick to judge as I just wanted to point out what I first noticed while looking at the new photo.
 

latenlazy

Brigadier
My apologies I will spend more time analyzing the photo and then presenting all my findings later. I was too quick to judge as I just wanted to point out what I first noticed while looking at the new photo.
Don’t bother. Unless someone with deep reliable street cred posts an image explicitly stating what it is, or unless the image is high quality enough for people to assess for themselves, this kind of blind guessing at low information content is meaningless.
 

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
My apologies I will spend more time analyzing the photo and then presenting all my findings later. I was too quick to judge as I just wanted to point out what I first noticed while looking at the new photo.

I think you've missed the point of what siege wrote.

The idea is that there's no use to analyze a photo of this quality. It has nothing to do with spending more time or effort to analyze it or giving it more attention as it currently stands.


If anything, it would be more useful for all of us if we just pretend this picture doesn't even exist because that's all the good an image of this quality does.
 
Top