Hmmm? This would be a new milestone, I'd be interested in the source.
Quite a development if true.
@huitong
So if the sawtooth nozzle is already in production, it could refer to the nozzle seen on the WS-10 engines. Correct me if that's wrong, but I think that means that externally, an aircraft fitted with WS-15 and that nozzle could be indistinguishable from a WS-10 with the saw-tooth nozzle... except possibly when turned on and staring into the rear of the engines...Hmmm? This would be a new milestone, I'd be interested in the source.
Quite a development if true.
@huitong
Could that could mean that all those cartoons we saw about J-10/J-20 discussing bigger "chrysanthemums" were about WS-15 instead of WS-10?If we get the cartoons then this is pretty much a done deal! Optimistically we can see production ready WS-15s in ithe 2023-2025 timeframe.
So if the sawtooth nozzle is already in production, it could refer to the nozzle seen on the WS-10 engines. Correct me if that's wrong, but I think that means that externally, an aircraft fitted with WS-15 and that nozzle could be indistinguishable from a WS-10 with the saw-tooth nozzle... except possibly when turned on and staring into the rear of the engines...
So if the sawtooth nozzle is already in production, it could refer to the nozzle seen on the WS-10 engines. Correct me if that's wrong, but I think that means that externally, an aircraft fitted with WS-15 and that nozzle could be indistinguishable from a WS-10 with the saw-tooth nozzle... except possibly when turned on and staring into the rear of the engines...
Is it normal, then, for engine nozzles to have gone into production years before the engine itself goes into production? I would think that they would go into production at least at similar times because a nozzle that went into production in 2018 or 2019 and is just sitting there for 4-5 years waiting to be mounted could be sub-optimal compared to the design/materials available to make them with by the time the engine is ready for production. I think it'd be pointless to produce and store them so far ahead of time, unless of course, they are a design that is already being used on other engines...No, there's no reason for us to believe that the WS-10 and WS-15 have the same nozzle. Yes, the WS-10 for J-20 (whatever its name is; WS-10C or what not) has serrations, but that doesn't mean it is the exact same as WS-15. There are many round engine nozzles with serrations that are still different in design -- F135, izd 30, WS-10C etc are all different from each other because they are all different engines.
As a different engine itself, there is no reason for us to think the WS-15 nozzle would be indistinguishable from WS-10C's nozzle, including for physical dimensions such as petals, nozzle length, etc.
Is it normal, then, for engine nozzles to have gone into production years before the engine itself goes into production? I would think that they would go into production at least at similar times because a nozzle that went into production in 2018 or 2019 and is just sitting there for 4-5 years waiting to be mounted could be sub-optimal compared to the design/materials available to make them with by the time the engine is ready for production. I think it'd be pointless to produce and store them so far ahead of time, unless of course, they are a design that is already being used on other engines...
Is it normal, then, for engine nozzles to have gone into production years before the engine itself goes into production? I would think that they would go into production at least at similar times because a nozzle that went into production in 2018 or 2019 and is just sitting there for 4-5 years waiting to be mounted could be sub-optimal compared to the design/materials available to make them with by the time the engine is ready for production. I think it'd be pointless to produce and store them so far ahead of time, unless of course, they are a design that is already being used on other engines...