How come they keep their state of the art aircraft in the open air and under direct sunshine like this? At least there should be some type of hanger. I think the US only pull their stealth fighter out of hanger when they need to fly it.
How come they keep their state of the art aircraft in the open air and under direct sunshine like this? At least there should be some type of hanger. I think the US only pull their stealth fighter out of hanger when they need to fly it.
Maybe because the J-20 has been made of far more durable materials than their much-vaunted U.S Counterparts? The PLAAF knows what their plane is capable of, and what environmental conditions it can withstand.
Yodello's point was "durable material of J-20", not the storage shelter.There's no reason to believe the PLAAF's storage practices for the J-20 are radically different than the F-22's.
Yodello's point was "durable material of J-20", not the storage shelter.
Yes they are linked, but I don't see anything wrong with that logic that you seems to be refuting. More durable coating means they are less vulnerable to natural elements, therefor can be exposed under direct sun light longer than F-22. It is answer to the original question from SteelBird "How come they keep their state of the art aircraft in the open air and under direct sunshine like this?"These two arguments were linked. He explicitly suggested that they're supposedly stored differently because one has more durable coatings than the other.
How come they keep their state of the art aircraft in the open air and under direct sunshine like this? At least there should be some type of hanger. I think the US only pull their stealth fighter out of hanger when they need to fly it.
I recall that the F-22’s coating was not as robust as intended so it ended up being more closed hangar dependent than originally planned, and a part of the F-35 program (or its lead up) was about developing more resilient coatings for stealth fighters.I don't think so. US practice for F-22s and F-35s does not mean they have to be under cover whenever they're not flying. You can find many photos online of F-22s at rest in the open air without cover.
You might be thinking about older F-117s and even B-2s, which required somewhat more robust hangar environments.
I recall that the F-22’s coating was not as robust as intended so it ended up being more closed hangar dependent than originally planned, and a part of the F-35 program (or its lead up) was about developing more resilient coatings for stealth fighters.