The points I like are:
The J-20 costs around 110 million, or 750 million RMB. This is a nice definite number, and puts it between the F-35 and F-22 in cost. Total development costs are quite low at about 44 million per production unit if we assume a tranche of 100, which should be quite low.
Second, confirmation of the WS-15 explosion. This isn't necessarily a bad thing, because SP is sourcing it to 2015, meaning that much time has passed and flight testing of WS-15 prototypes may already begin. Moreover, strategypage is implying that the WS-15 has been less problematic than others have expected (i.e, it's less difficult to fix).
The point is, when you look at a fanboy page, the most reliable facts are when they discuss the weaknesses of their fetish object. When you look at a basher page, the most reliable facts are when they discuss the strengths of their hate object.
But of course, this is ultimately Strategypage. It's just a site that deals with rumors, often manufactured. The important thing is getting a hold of the TV show that reported these "facts".
Obviously, the J-20 is not for export; the Pakistanis are going to pick up the J-31, first, second, the Pakistanis can barely afford J-10s, so why would they be able to / want to pick up a fighter that's twice the cost of a J-10B? Strategypage is obviously wrong in this regard, and from our observations, the cited wing area of the J-20 by strategypage is absurd by our own measurements (75 m^2 blended body, strategypage claims around 63 m^2).