The devil is in the details and your HenriK article is missing them as far as its relevancy to this discussion. What we are talking about is NOT just metamaterials, but current anti-UHF metamaterials in use in the J-20 program. Note that we are talking about anti-UHF not anti-X metamaterials. The former is a far bigger deal than the latter, not least because it is not easily used due to the bulk of the material needed to absorb UHF frequencies. Now before you quote a study on current attempts in reducing the thickness of anti-UHF metamaterials, we are (again) talking about current anti-UHF metamaterial use in the J-20 program. That is, metamaterial research is done, it is specifically anti-UHF, and it is currently being used in the J-20 program. Posting unconnected articles and insinuating some kind of tenuous connection between them is not intellectually rigorous reasoning.