J-20 5th Gen Fighter Thread V

[kwaigonegin]

I think you find gentlemen should move on from this topic of espionage, trade secrets etc. We all know they exist and everyone does it to some extent however this is not the right thread for it.... Besides there are only so much differences in a 5th gen airctaft or all aircraft for that matter. Most things will have commonalities.

Unless you have concrete proof and evidence in which case I hope you go to the relevant authorities instead of posting it here, we need to get back on topic.

 

[Deino]

...and finally, J-20 2101, the first production J-20 (still waiting on flight!)

View attachment 23893

There is something strange .... Jeff, Your image of '2101 (below) is exactly the same as shown as the just yesterday posted '2102' (top) ... so there's something wrong with at least one of them.



However in mind of this other image of '2101' also posted yesterday, I would say it's more likely that '2102' is the fake !??

 

[delft]

2102 bois!!!!!!!!

2 J20 per month=24 per year. Well, that is the minimum production speed.

Don't base your estimate on the appearance of two aircraft. You might be out by a factor of two. Not that I expect anything near 12 or 48.

Just saw Deino's post.

 

[Deino]

Yes .... ohhh, how much I hate these Photoshop-idiots !




However these are real ...

 

[siegecrossbow]

Yes .... ohhh, how much I hate these Photoshop-idiots !

View attachment 23936


However these are real ...


View attachment 23937

View attachment 23938

I think the 2102 photos were unfortunately confirmed to be fakes.

 

[asif iqbal]

Thing I don't get is with such a robust J20 programme why do fanboys feel the need to Psed images ! Only makes PLAAF watching more difficult

2102 will appear why spoil it for what reason

 

[Deino]

I think the 2102 photos were unfortunately confirmed to be fakes.

YES, sadly .. but I asked a friend of mine who's an artist working a lot with Photoshop and he told me that in this strange collage, the numbers are genuine or most likely real ... so either is was a real professional "faker" at work or they do indeed exist !

 

[delft]

YES, sadly .. but I asked a friend of mine who's an artist working a lot with Photoshop and he told me that in this strange collage, the numbers are genuine or most likely real ... so either is was a real professional "faker" at work or they do indeed exist !

View attachment 23953

Does that mean these numbers were photographed while the aircraft are being built?

 

[kriss]

Thing I don't get is with such a robust J20 programme why do fanboys feel the need to Psed images ! Only makes PLAAF watching more difficult

2102 will appear why spoil it for what reason

To troll deino of course.

 

[kriss]

YES, sadly .. but I asked a friend of mine who's an artist working a lot with Photoshop and he told me that in this strange collage, the numbers are genuine or most likely real ... so either is was a real professional "faker" at work or they do indeed exist !

View attachment 23953

Does your friend mean the four-digital number as a whole is real which means 2102 and 2103 is out there or the indivdual single digital number is real which the serial number as a whole could be a ps work?

ps. Hope your friend could come here and join us. We need this type of talent so badly.