J-20 5th Gen Fighter Thread IV (Closed to posting)

Status
Not open for further replies.

MastanKhan

Junior Member
Well, the AMRAAM, AIM-120D, has a published range of just over 95 nautical miles.

That's about 110 miles, or 177 kilometers.

If you use 97 nautical miles for the absolute (as some do), you end up with 111.6 miles and 180 km.

But those are optimum distances with optimum conditions.

Hi,

Would you happen to know at what distance it has 90% kill ratio against a fighter sized aircraft.
 

lllchairmanlll

Junior Member
Registered Member
Hi,

Would you happen to know at what distance it has 90% kill ratio against a fighter sized aircraft.
Hi, according to Zhuo Yin, a PLAN expert on a CCTV program, modern day fighter jets normally fire active homing missiles in less than 50KM range. For targets beyond 100 KM, jet needs to be at very high level of energy and also awacs like E-3 and KJ-2000 is needed to help you guide missile. Not only that, he said that if air targets like jets have significant higher level of energy than the jet that is firing the missile (I assume he meant altitude and speed? not sure), then the missile could be easily evaded.
 

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Well, the AMRAAM, AIM-120D, has a published range of just over 95 nautical miles.

That's about 110 miles, or 177 kilometers.

If you use 97 nautical miles for the absolute (as some do), you end up with 111.6 miles and 180 km.

But those are optimum distances with optimum conditions.

I'm just saying that those kind of numbers never happen in practice, so it's kind of pointless to mention them close to realistic. I've heard from people that 30 km is probably maximum effective range of the earlier AMRAAMs, so I'm assuming PL-12 and R-77 are probably in the same ballpark. AIM-120D could be a lot longer than that, but only the air force themselves have tested it out and have a good idea of the true effective range. Which I clearly have no access to.
 

Air Force Brat

Brigadier
Super Moderator
Other things, seems J-20 don't get a gun, surprising ! you confirm ?
Well the F-35 Bravo and Charlie are packing a can of heat??? maybe that's the J-bird plan as well?

I would add that no self respecting fighter "should" come without an internal gun, its just never been right, but its been done way to much?? and yes I know why, and yes it is heavy, but it works so much better, kinda like a 45/70 Sharps Rifle, as opposed to a 12 Guage slug gun?
 

plawolf

Lieutenant General
Other things, seems J-20 don't get a gun, surprising ! you confirm ?

The IFR probe bay was only recently positively proved because of the high quality fit and finish on the J20. Where it was only very visible when open.

I would be very surprised if it doesn't have an internal cannon.

The placement is either on the opposite cheek to the IFR bay (maybe on the lower side of the cheek to avoid flash blinding the pilot) or over the shoulder somewhere similar to the F22's gun placement.

We never really got any ultra-high definition pictures of the J20's back, so I think the best bet would be over the shoulder.
 

Air Force Brat

Brigadier
Super Moderator
The IFR probe bay was only recently positively proved because of the high quality fit and finish on the J20. Where it was only very visible when open.

I would be very surprised if it doesn't have an internal cannon.

The placement is either on the opposite cheek to the IFR bay (maybe on the lower side of the cheek to avoid flash blinding the pilot) or over the shoulder somewhere similar to the F22's gun placement.

We never really got any ultra-high definition pictures of the J20's back, so I think the best bet would be over the shoulder.

I fully concur with Wolfie on this, and I too will be very surprised if it does not have an internal cannon?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top