J-20 5th Gen Fighter Thread IV (Closed to posting)

[Phoenix_Rising]

Is this real ??? Usually that guy is quite a reliable poster ?!!!

I suppose that you probably just met another PS amateur.

Check my post above.

The news was come from the "intelligence department" of a respected millitary forum in China.

Photos are from the main site of sina.

 

[Deino]

I suppose that you probably just met another PS amateur.

Check my post above.

The news was come from the "intelligence department" of a respected millitary forum in China.

Photos are from the main site of sina.

Sorry, maybe I misunderstand You and Your post, but do You think '2015' is only a fake or this image is a ps-job !??

My remark was related to this guy's images ... "the man with the small rabbit" is usually very reliable even if this image might be from a PS amateur.

The fact alone that they are from the main site of sina does not make them more reliable for me.


PS: If correct, then the tail booms look different.

 

[Totoro]

i must say, the size of the different colored tip of tail booms and the angled cutout does seem peculiar. if itnis just ram why not cover a larger area and why make it angled? if putting passive sensors inside - one wouldnt need nearly as huge cutout. i guess it is possible there are both passive and acitve arrays in each of the booms, covering the rear hemisphere...

 

[Phoenix_Rising]

Sorry, maybe I misunderstand You and Your post, but do You think '2015' is only a fake or this image is a ps-job !??

My remark was related to this guy's images ... "the man with the small rabbit" is usually very reliable even if this image might be from a PS amateur.

If correct, then the tail booms look different.

You mean SE.TEAHOUSE the person? Oh, he is a wall-climber or grass-crawler on CJDBY. His photo had been quoted by several famous websites for millitary news. Yeah, his photos are reliable.

 

[Deino]

You mean SE.TEAHOUSE the person? Oh, he is a wall-climber or grass-crawler on CJDBY. His photo had been quoted by several famous websites for millitary news. Yeah, his photos are reliable.

Thanks ... so just to be sure ! What images do You think we done by a PS-amateur ? (IMO all images showing 2015 are legit, the onl yone clearly psed is in post #4680)

Deino

 

[Phoenix_Rising]

Thanks ... so just to be sure ! What images do You think we done by a PS-amateur ? (IMO all images showing 2015 are legit, the onl yone clearly psed is in post #4680)

Deino

Exactly the one in post#4680...

and the one you shown in #4688.

I don't know why SE.TEAHOUSE only appeared in June and July this year,

and his photos looks was quite suspicious, the sheen is always too exaggeratied.

 

[Deino]

...

and I don't know why SE.TEAHOUSE only appeared in June and July this year

Maybe he had or at least wanted to avoid an invitation to a tea-party by the authorities !?

 

[Phoenix_Rising]

Maybe he had or at least wanted to avoid an invitation to a tea-party by the authorities !?

He is not an important one of the paparazzis. If the watchdogs wanna invite someone, he wouldn't be on the first half of the list.

He didn't post many pictures on CD.

 

[Air Force Brat]

Correction, took off at 14:04.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

A thread at CJDBY.

And, two series of photos in which contains Miss 2015, from sina.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

PAK-FA have had some trouble in structure in test flights. As almost the entire axis is tunneled for weapon cavity, the structural strength is surely weakened. Let's see how Russians solve that with... mere hope.

Chinese netizens sometimes call PAK-FA "扁-27", meas "Flattened-27".:roll:

Please post some sources on the PAK-FA, to my knowledge the structural issues were primarily with the first Pro-to-type- 01 ?? and in all honesty the Russians "try" to break their aircraft in testing, they do not mess around, and we have not witnessed any of that type of flight testing with the J-20. Not saying it hasn't happened, but we sure haven't seen "any" strenuous maneuvering?? we have seen PAK-FA flying a fairly standard airshow routine, so we really don't know how they stack up in all honesty?

 

[thunderchief]

To admit this is IMO simply the same image we found yesterday with the original markings + a few more areas blurred out ! ... but not a new or different image.

Deino

Yes, you are right. And that one from post #4665 ?