J-20 5th Gen Fighter Thread IV (Closed to posting)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Deino

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Ohhh please not in this 'artificial' way :mad: ... just show us that bird pure and simple ... naked at best :eek: (by the way it would surely be interesting to see a 'naked' J-20 without primer or even colour !!! :p:p:p)

Brrrrr ... I think I need my pills again.

Deino

PS: Do You notice the detonation chord in the rear part of the canopy !?
 

Attachments

  • J-20 2011 - 25.2.14.jpg
    J-20 2011 - 25.2.14.jpg
    98.8 KB · Views: 91

Deino

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
:confused::confused::p:p:confused::confused::D:D

Already in December 2012 !!
 

Attachments

  • J-20 2x at Xian-Yanliang - December 2012.jpg
    J-20 2x at Xian-Yanliang - December 2012.jpg
    151.1 KB · Views: 100

kyanges

Junior Member
Ohhh please not in this 'artificial' way :mad: ... just show us that bird pure and simple ... naked at best :eek: (by the way it would surely be interesting to see a 'naked' J-20 without primer or even colour !!! :p:p:p)

Brrrrr ... I think I need my pills again.

Deino

PS: Do You notice the detonation chord in the rear part of the canopy !?

What I notice more is that talk of how the engines are now completely covered from the side-view is wrong, regardless of if we're talking about this being due to slightly repositioned nozzles, or moved fins. In fact, so far as I can see from this and other pictures, aside from the slight reshaping of the space between the engines, there's no difference in that part of the rear.
 
Last edited:

Deino

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Slowly they are coming out .... :p

Any idea when it will finally fly ?? :confused:
 

Attachments

  • J-20 2011 - 25.2.14 - 2.jpg
    J-20 2011 - 25.2.14 - 2.jpg
    108.8 KB · Views: 101

kwaigonegin

Colonel
The particular way the foreground flowers are slightly transparent confuses me. Nice picture though.

Huh? that's because the camera was focused on the plane not the flowers which were obviously much closer to the camera and that's why they looked blurry and 'transparent'.
 

Deino

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
What I notice more is that talk of how the engines are now completely covered from the side-view is wrong, regardless of if we're talking about this being due to slightly repositioned nozzles, or moved fins. In fact, so far as I can see from this and other pictures, aside from the slight reshaping of the space between the engines, there's no difference in that part of the rear.

Yeppp ... !!!
 

Attachments

  • J-20 2002 + 2011 the same.jpg
    J-20 2002 + 2011 the same.jpg
    143.9 KB · Views: 109

kyanges

Junior Member
Huh? that's because the camera was focused on the plane not the flowers which were obviously much closer to the camera and that's why they looked blurry and 'transparent'.

I meant I'm just not used to seeing photos with such an enormous difference between the foreground and what's being focused on. The huge difference means that the blurry flowers aren't just blurry. They look like something pasted onto the image and set at a low opacity. To be clear, I know it's a legit image. :) .


Yeppp ... !!!

Awww, the J-20's even longer now. :p .
 

Deino

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Awww, the J-20's even longer now. :p .

Oh NO :mad::mad::mad: ... certain members at both the Key- and the Secret-Projects Forum will instantly cry out that they were correct, that the J-20 is a lame duck or a huuuuuge long-range striker at best !!

Deino
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Yeppp ... !!!
Here...I helped on the 2002 number that was mirrored and never fixed:


2002-2011-compare.jpg


Looks like the 2011 may be twelve to sixteen inches longer than the earlier prototypes.

Any idea when it will finally fly ?? :confused:
Soon, my friend...soon!

Perhaps very soon as in any day now.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top