airsuperiority
Captain
I seriously love this J-20 discussion group. Everyone's so fun and intelligent to chat with, and hear opinions from.
I already made it clear that I was coming from the j-20 basher's standpoint and the purpose of my example was to point out the ridiculousness and contradictions in their argument. Read my post carefully.
The DSI speed limit is`nt a matter of bashing the J-20 is a matter of physics, pressure recovery loses always drop thrust yield on the engine, in few words more pressure loses on a duct less thrust, and at high speeds ingesting pressure socks is equivalent to trying to lit a match in a hurricane.
If the engine is lucky it will only get damaged.
That has never been bashing, that is pure fact of physics
Source:11. A system according to claim 8, wherein the airbreathing propulsion system includes speeds of approximately Mach 2.5 to Mach 10.
Keep on fantasizing. A diverterless inlet can be made to operate at hypersonic range if needed. There is no magic speed limit at Mach 2.0 for diverterless inlet system.
Source:
please more ... but without that nasty stamp on it
I think it's safe to say at this point only 4 will be carried which is dissappointing. I think the designers/engineers could've easily added another one to make it 5 but they decided to stay even at 4.
IMO the quetion was not if five would have been possible, but if 4 or 6 were a reasonable or usefull load. 5 would have meant that the center bulkhead - and as such a different bay design would have been required - has to be deleted.
Anyway I still hope that this is only the load of this AAM and maybe for a type with smaller span or clipped fins 6 could be fitted.
Deino