J-20 5th Gen Fighter Thread IV (Closed to posting)
- Thread starter siegecrossbow
- Start date
- Status
Chief Thundercloud, 21 posts lad, your speed is good, but you havent "hit" anything yet, maybe Dirty Harry was right??? Honestly when America entered the Korean "conflict, we brought out Mustangs, Bearcats, B-29s and A-26s, the F-80 and F-84 both started out as straight wing jets, and although the F-84f received a swept wing the F-86 was the only "true" American airsuperiority fighter to see action, while the 10 to 1 ratio may be high, 4 to 1 is low, more likely 6 to 1 on actual air to air engagements, I'd say North American did quite well under the circumstances. While the Russians were obviously at an advantage over their Chinese and North Korean allies, the US had some real talent and depth as well, you're comment, though provocative, is highly suspect and unsubstantiated, I have never heard a credible source suggest such nonsence, "realistically speaking", and yes I am smirking, watch your six, it is showing!
Now gentlemen, back on topic please, where is 2003 men?, I want pix and videos of her first flight, and Chengdu, I want a full report of why she hasn't flown yet by Monday Morning, 8:00 AM CST. or there will be consequences..... Brat
Actually Mig, I have already spoken for the first US PakFa, Brat
coolieno99
Junior Member
The kill ratio is still in dispute. The original kill ratio of 15-to-1 in favor of Americans have been repeatedly revised downward so many times that the American claims have lost all credibility. The Russians(most of the MiG-15 pilots were Russians) themselves claimed a 2-to-1 ratio in their favor. The real ratio is probably 1-to-1.
Last edited:
Yeah, those are no doubt authoritative sources that ANY fanboi would be glad to quote, good luck sellin that stuff coolio, I usually put that on the garden, and we are still OFF TOPIC.... wow! you read that stuff??? love the drownings at the bottom of the page, done by a real live arrrrtissst no doubt???? Brat
AeroEngineer
Junior Member
Guys please check out J-20 on Wikipedia.
Go and see how much prejiduice there are towards the Chinese. Especially the indians.
Today I was edditing the J-20's engine section and there is always some rats keep edditing it back, and later I got a message from someone called hucco. I click on his web page on wikipedia and he is an indian. These low life indians keep saying thing like this: " There is a belief that China is unable to come up with an engine for J-20". Then it says that China wants 117S, then right after it says: China will not be buying Su-35. Then it goes one and describe WS-15 !!
See this !! This is indian logic, lol. It never makes sense !
They will just never quit on J-20, even though their sh!t LCA can not even fly with American F-404 handed to them.
BTW, I was also very happy that J-20 had such a devastating affect on these low life indians !
I hope that they spend 20 hours a day just guarding J-20's wikipedia page. lol
Go and see how much prejiduice there are towards the Chinese. Especially the indians.
Today I was edditing the J-20's engine section and there is always some rats keep edditing it back, and later I got a message from someone called hucco. I click on his web page on wikipedia and he is an indian. These low life indians keep saying thing like this: " There is a belief that China is unable to come up with an engine for J-20". Then it says that China wants 117S, then right after it says: China will not be buying Su-35. Then it goes one and describe WS-15 !!
See this !! This is indian logic, lol. It never makes sense !
They will just never quit on J-20, even though their sh!t LCA can not even fly with American F-404 handed to them.
BTW, I was also very happy that J-20 had such a devastating affect on these low life indians !
I hope that they spend 20 hours a day just guarding J-20's wikipedia page. lol
Engineer
Major
Guys please check out J-20 on Wikipedia.
Go and see how much prejiduice there are towards the Chinese. Especially the indians.
Today I was edditing the J-20's engine section and there is always some rats keep edditing it back, and later I got a message from someone called hucco. I click on his web page on wikipedia and he is an indian. These low life indians keep saying thing like this: " There is a belief that China is unable to come up with an engine for J-20". Then it says that China wants 117S, then right after it says: China will not be buying Su-35. Then it goes one and describe WS-15 !!
See this !! This is indian logic, lol. It never makes sense !
They will just never quit on J-20, even though their sh!t LCA can not even fly with American F-404 handed to them.
BTW, I was also very happy that J-20 had such a devastating affect on these low life indians !
I hope that they spend 20 hours a day just guarding J-20's wikipedia page. lol
First, any article on Wikipedia is the product of multiple edits from multiple authors. That paragraph in particular is a delicate compromise between people with different opinions, hence it is self contradictory.
Secondly, there isn't anything incorrect from the paragraph. Is there prejudice against China's ability to build turbofan engine? This is a yes, so the (religious) belief being referred to exists. Are there claims that China wants Su-35? Yes, because China wouldn't have to officially denied rumors regarding Su-35 purchases otherwise. Did Russians attempted to solicit China to buy 117S engine in the previous Zhuhai airshow? This is a yes as well, and China hasn't shown any interest.
Thirdly, the correct method to counter a source which you believe to be bias is to quote from a more reliable one. Blanking out the entire paragraph is a no-no, and is the reason why your edits are being reverted. For your information, links to a baidu wiki page is not considered as using a reliable source either.
AeroEngineer
Junior Member
Good points Engineer.
But you just have to be amazed by the indians and their infeority complext. It is maginificent !
BTW, do you have any more realiable sources to share with ??
Thank you.
Last edited:
- Status