D for Dian (EW) or SU-35 counterpart?
The J-11D is indeed contrary to the J-15D & J-16D not an EW-type but the next letter in the J-11-series.
In fact the J-15D & J-16D should better be called JD-15 and JD-16.
D for Dian (EW) or SU-35 counterpart?
Ah them naming schemes. So PLAAF skipped J-11C? Last i heard it was J-11BG or something.The J-11D is indeed contrary to the J-15D & J-16D not an EW-type but the next letter in the J-11-series.
In fact the J-15D & J-16D should better be called JD-15 and JD-16.
Ah them naming schemes. So PLAAF skipped J-11C? Last i heard it was J-11BG or something.
We've already got J-11A, J-11B. J-15 was originally called J-11C. And there comes D.D for Dian (EW) or SU-35 counterpart?
… Or “Intelligence Victory” in the backseatWell, the USAF just ordered new built F15s, so new built Flankers are in good company.
As a PL15 mass spammer, the J11D would be very much viable.
Whether the J11D makes sense is probably a little more complex than at first glance. In addition to the obvious considerations like production cost of J11Ds vs upgrade costs of already build J11s, balanced with remaining airframe hours. You may also have more practical considerations like pilot numbers and keeping the flanker line open for wartime replenishments etc.
Both of the pilots in a J16 are fully qualified combat pilots in all aspects of flying and air combat.
That means you could potentially spin up a new regiment of J11Ds as soon as the planes roll off the factory floor by stripping a pilot from each plane from a J16 regiment and have the remaining pilots either fly solo, or stick a final year cadet in the back seat to help out.
That could be very valuable in war time to rapidly expand your combat ready numbers.