J-10 Thread IV

Viperzero

New Member
Registered Member
I remember this, damn I'm getting old. My uncle is in two of those photos, both from the back...hehehe. He was the lead engineer for one of J10's critical areas.
By any chance does he know anything about the 1991 J-10?
 

Attachments

  • 63459FC6-B830-4EEE-8A8E-ADB85BDC18A5.jpeg
    63459FC6-B830-4EEE-8A8E-ADB85BDC18A5.jpeg
    159.5 KB · Views: 63
  • 6F601623-8094-4855-9543-8F409D0966B8.jpeg
    6F601623-8094-4855-9543-8F409D0966B8.jpeg
    88.4 KB · Views: 49
  • 80D62CD1-2D6B-400A-838D-CD5DB983C53A.jpeg
    80D62CD1-2D6B-400A-838D-CD5DB983C53A.jpeg
    115.1 KB · Views: 45
  • 0B3CD511-BE60-457B-B5DC-209746073414.jpeg
    0B3CD511-BE60-457B-B5DC-209746073414.jpeg
    72.7 KB · Views: 52

TheFuture_NoMore

New Member
Registered Member
A Pakistani J-10CE.

52711383456_bd326241e9_k.jpg

Not sure if the J10CE has enough hardpoints or payload capability to qualify as "omni-role" when compared to the Rafale/Typhoon ?

It is also interesting that the fuel tanks are permanently attached to the PAF J10CE ... do think i have seen a configuration without the fuel tanks yet.

Also PAF operates the watered down PL15E variant of the PL15 - so question mark of how it benchmarks against the Meteor in both range, and NEZ. It is also unknow if the J10CE can provide midcourse guidance to a launched PL15E ( or if PL15E can receive updates ).

Alot of unknowns of how PAF J10CE's compare with PLAAF J10C's.

Mean looking paint job - looks ready for business.
 

zavve

New Member
Registered Member
Also PAF operates the watered down PL15E variant of the PL15 - so question mark of how it benchmarks against the Meteor in both range, and NEZ.
In terms of NEZ, Meteor should be superior merely due to having a ramjet instead of a rocket motor. No idea how PL15E differs from the PLAAF PL15, maybe @Deino knows more?
 

Viperzero

New Member
Registered Member
That’s not even a real plane. It is an all metal model before the design was frozen. My guess would be that it is gathering dust in storage today if it is lucky.
A somewhat recent picture (note the J-10s model in the back) I had to be somewhere.


Anyway
J-10A hud
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
J-10c hud

both are very similar to the JF-17 hud


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
J-10 fighting flankers in DACT
 

Attachments

  • A27D4227-8C58-4E82-B591-02CA2F1617C7.png
    A27D4227-8C58-4E82-B591-02CA2F1617C7.png
    453.1 KB · Views: 41

Deino

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
The development chart is a lot longer than this. This is after they set on the design. Original j10 design they didn't even decide on canards.


But wasn't this part of the J-10's history made under the J-9-designation?
 

PiSigma

"the engineer"
But wasn't this part of the J-10's history made under the J-9-designation?
J9 was a separate project, the design specs were different. J10 they had to start from scratch but did take lessons learned from J9. Reevaluation of canards was first step. A normal delta wing design like Tejas was considered and rejected fairly early (couldn't meet requirements).
 
Top