This statement makes no sense at all. Reducing radar reflection IS improving stealth. You're now twisting definitions so you don't have to admit that a DSI can be stealthy. Either that or I would have to question whether you even understand the concept of stealth. The fact is that a flat surface that reflects radar waves away from the emitter source is just as stealthy as a curved surface that reflects radar waves away from the emitter.
You're now twisting definitions so you don't have to admit that a DSI can be stealthy. Either that or I would have to question whether you even understand the concept of stealth. The fact is that a flat surface that reflects radar waves away from the emitter source is just as stealthy as a curved surface that reflects radar waves away from the emitter.
What is the difference between a rounded surface and a curved surface?
Doesn't matter if the radar wave doesn't return to the emitter.Woudn't having nothing in the way of the radar wave be the best option?
Reflecting diffusely doesn't mean they reflect back to the emitter. You seriously need to look more closely at how the DSI is positioned and shaped on the aircraft. You also haven't answered why Lockheed would choose DSI for its other 5th generation STEALTH aircraft, the F-35.Radar waves reflect diffusely, just like light (i.e. visible part of the EM spectrum).
Why should that matter to you, if you are trying to claim that radar waves reflect "diffusely"?Rounded as in part of a circle? Curve as in the shape of an aerofoil?
S-shaped inlets do perform that function, but radar is still bouncing around in an interior surface and getting amplified. It's not just the jet engine that generates a radar reflection, but the interior surfaces of the intake. When radar enters any interior structure it will reflect off of all the surfaces within that structure and generate a stronger return than if it just reflects off one surface. Anyways, the main point was that just because you have empty space where a DSI would be doesn't mean your radar return will be smaller. In fact depending on how you've shaped, coated, and designed the interior of the inlet, it could be bigger.Then, what's the use of the S-shaped inlet duct? Its purpose is to get the jet engine away from the line of sight through the air intake. i.e. to let the radar waves bypass the jet engine completely.
You didn't. I was just trying to point out that even if there's an empty space where the DSI bump would be, the radar would eventually hit something anyways. In the case of an inlet, bouncing off an external structure it's much easier to control where the radar is reflected than an internal structure.Sorry, I don't think I made such a claim in anyway.
I believe rounded and curved mean the same thing...Not really rounded surfaces but very large curve surfaces.
Doesn't matter if the radar wave doesn't return to the emitter.
Reflecting diffusely doesn't mean they reflect back to the emitter. You seriously need to look more closely at how the DSI is positioned and shaped on the aircraft. You also haven't answered why Lockheed would choose DSI for its other 5th generation STEALTH aircraft, the F-35.
Why should that matter to you, if you are trying to claim that radar waves reflect "diffusely"?
.....I believe rounded and curved mean the same thing...
A large curve surface looks more like a flat surface when viewed up close whereas a similar sized round surface would still look round when viewed up close.
I think I'll just stop here on this topic.
Reflecting diffusely means all angles including back to the source. Of course, most of the wave energy is concentrated around the angle of incident/reflection.
A large curve surface looks more like a flat surface when viewed up close whereas a similar sized round surface would still look round when viewed up close.
I think I'll just stop here on this topic.
You don't know what you're talking about.