J-10 Thread III (Closed to posting)

[A.Man]

Any Idea?

 

[Deino]

Any Idea?

I would say "simply" an full AB-test of a J-10A which is not necessarily related to AC-test !

Deino

 

[Deino]

Any Idea?

I would say "simply" an full AB-test of a J-10A which is not necessarily related to AC-test !

Deino

 

[Munir]

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Just a full AB test.

 

[franco-russe]

I would say "simply" an full AB-test of a J-10A which is not necessarily related to AC-test !

Deino

And you taught me to recognise a J-10S!

 

[Deino]

And you taught me to recognise a J-10S!

Oh no ... to much holydays, sea and red-whine !

Deino

 

[Deino]

Since we know that all known prototypes 1031 - 1035 are painted ... is this a new bird ???

Deino

 

[no_name]

Regarding the double pylon, do the two have to carry the same type of weapons or can they carry different weapons? (ie are each hardpoint only assigned to one type of weapon at any time or can there be more flexibilities?)

 

[AssassinsMace]

I don't see a fuel probe on that J-10B. Plus it doesn't have those modifications on the fuselage for the canards.

 

[Munir]

The IFR could be behind the nose/cockpit or is not copied during PS (the background does not match with the plane). But the huge RWR in front of the canard is indeed missing. Maybe a prototype for weapon testing only? Or the PAF J10B?