J-10 Thread III (Closed to posting)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Deino

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Hmmm ... IMO the bombs You mention are simply too new but these are LGB's & no sure if really operational ones but this is what I have:

Deino
 

Attachments

  • J-10 prototype unveiling.jpg
    J-10 prototype unveiling.jpg
    54.8 KB · Views: 112
  • J-10_LGB1.jpg
    J-10_LGB1.jpg
    78.5 KB · Views: 115
  • J-10A + LGB LS-500J.jpg
    J-10A + LGB LS-500J.jpg
    61.2 KB · Views: 96

Speeder

Junior Member
Hmmm ... IMO the bombs You mention are simply too new but these are LGB's & no sure if really operational ones but this is what I have:

Deino

Many thanks, Deino, for this timely response! It reminds me of an old Sneaker bar commercial: Nothing bites Lion! So here is No One Beats Deino! :D

several trival things:

Those photos ( appear old) are of about 2008 vintage when J-10 was officially out (?), particularly the 1st one - looks even somewhat ANCIENT. Can I roughly say so when quote?

I hope these fotos could do... LGBs are precision bombs anyway. I guess the only thing "the opponents" could say will be " no single flying J-10 with these bombs shows the incapability to launch? " or something like that?


I just realised that it appears very rare to find a clip/photo on J-10 launching a precision bomb, LGBs or NAV SAT-guided, or simplely a photo of flying with them underneath. On the other hand, th US and Eurpean jets doing such photo-ops shooting ammos are everywhere in the web. I am a bit puzzled as one can see photos of LT-2 on JH-7, J-8, etc old jets, why similar photos aren't easily available with J-10, since LT-2 is relatively a very very old bomb indeed?

Any explainations? Or no confirmation whatsoever that these bombs are operational on J-10?
 
Last edited:

Deino

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
You are correct and again the main reason IMO is that 1. these weapons are quite new in the PLAAF arsenal and 2. the J-10 was at first only able to use the PL-9, PL-11 ... now even later than the J-8F units it receives the PL-12 ... in regard to air-to-ground ordonance I only know simple dumb-bumbs, practice dispensers and rocket pods.

As such I think the J-10 is just receiving these weapons mybe simply since it has just been cleared to use them now.

Regarding the timeframe of the photos: the first one is most likely the unveiling ceremony of the J-10-prototype (J-10 1001 was ready by May and the roll-out ceremony took part on 2. June 1997) whereas the other photos are "saved" on my harddrive are 31. May 2007 for "J-10A + LGB LS-500J" and 27. ‎August ‎2010 for "J-10_LGB1" ! Hope that helps a bit. ;)
 

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General
So why are the Russians advertising their engine with a J-10?

cdaae6e9df944ecb98f81d1.jpg
 

Deino

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
I wouldn't overestimate that ! ... and otherwise it's simply correct, since the AL-31FN is only used by the J-10.

Deino
 

i.e.

Senior Member
You are correct and again the main reason IMO is that 1. these weapons are quite new in the PLAAF arsenal and 2. the J-10 was at first only able to use the PL-9, PL-11 ... now even later than the J-8F units it receives the PL-12 ... in regard to air-to-ground ordonance I only know simple dumb-bumbs, practice dispensers and rocket pods.

)

Most regiments receiving J-10 up to this point has been interceptor regiments. keep in mind most Fighter regiments in chna are focused on airdefence only, very limited air2 ground operations. with the withdrawn of Q-5 and the reorientation of PLAAF it will get changed over time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top