^ I believe that is a pair of j-10a's with standard al-31 rather than j-10b's with WS-10
Pic 1 & 3 are WS-10 powered J-10B
Pic 2 show J-10A with AL-31FN
Pic 4 is unclear
100% for sure ... but I would love to see their numberes !
Deino
^ I believe that is a pair of j-10a's with standard al-31 rather than j-10b's with WS-10
Pic 1 & 3 are WS-10 powered J-10B
Pic 2 show J-10A with AL-31FN
Pic 4 is unclear
True, but can your canards provide 9G near your ceiling? The question is each time: what is the specification and how can I ensure that my aircraft can comply.When the aircraft can pull 9G with one, then there is little point to retain the other. Extra maneuverability means little if the pilot cannot survive it.
May be not vanity, but India isn't strong enough in aeronautics to see through b.s. India itself could have asked Sukhoi to make the aircraft more maneuverable, and Sukhoi could have responded by blowing off dust from some old blueprints. Sukhoi could have also told India that it is good to add certain features. In either case, India wouldn't know better.
Oh yeah? How many wind tunnels do they have compared to US, Russia, China, France or UK? India's track record with its existing aircraft isn't pretty, either.
Parked J-10B with WS-10A engine
A closer look at J-10B with WS-10A engine
[Note: Thank you to HouShanghai for the pictures.]
Now, this is surely worth highlighting.
Though, hardly worth a comment.
I didn't know how important wind tunnels are.
But just out of curiosity and random search, I found this link:
So, it looks like the number of wind tunnels is not zero, atleast.
I don't know what they are used for though ... and perhaps, you'll further add that India wouldn't know , either, what they are used for. Okay, sure.