It was a weak attack. Iran can definitely walk away and end it here. But then again, an attack is an attack, no matter how impotent. Iran could very well justify a minor retaliation, but actually hit something useful (a single rocket hitting an ammo depot). Something that does not invite outrage, has tangible benefit, yet too shameful to downplay. Which reaction should Iran pick?It is fairly evident that this "attack" was a measured response designed to give Iran the initiative to de-escalate whilst simultaneously fulfilling what has long been promised to Israel's citizenry and intelligentsia by their government.
View attachment 137812
I think there should be a careful weighing opportunity cost. Yes Iran can say they come out on top if they stop. Or they could win bigger. Iran is not pushed to the edge, but Israeli politician's career is pushed to edge. A small attack could slap their face and make their position untenable, force them to save face elsewhere. They would be pushed to make more mistakes that they otherwise would not make.
Keep the small win or set up something bigger?