You might want to read the rest of my quote. I emboldened it as well:You can defend the US Navy all you want, but its loss of credibility is real whether you like it or not.
Just look at the comments.
Even US shill OSINT is inferior
View attachment 130503
View attachment 130504
View attachment 130505
View attachment 130506
This problem isn't unique to the US Navy, Nasa is having the same problems. There is a good Chinese Film Let the Bullets Fly, you should check it out if you haven't already.
I am saying that everyone should be cautious about getting too exciting and jumping to conclusions without further evidence. I agree that the seeds of distrust have sown by the captain himself due to incompetence or panic. However, we cannot resolutely conclude that the US carrier was indeed struck. As for the comments and NASA, I have no clue what you are trying to convey.That is a possibility as well, or he is slow and unable to read the room. "Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence", as Napoleon once said. This quote is especially fitting for the US Navy given the string of controversies and scandals it was embroiled in. I understand that everyone here do not like the US, but matters like these require some critical thinking and extreme cool-headedness, especially if you understand the weaponry on the carriers, the formations of an American CSG and the roles of the types of ships in the group, the tech level of an older version of an Iranian ASBM, and etc.
You should compare the two organization and configuration of the aircraft on the deck within the two photos before jumping that fast to a conclusion. You and I have been on this forum long enough to be wary of the small details found in photos.View attachment 130507
Thoughts on this comment? Would he really be stupid enough to lie twice in the same way? If it was indeed a lie, then I am almost certain carrier was hit.
此地无银三百两