TerraN_EmpirE
Tyrant King
Missiles that hit the ground leave debris just like downed Missiles do. Showing the Missiles debris out of context doesn't mean much to prove or disprove any claims.
the article made a point, which is
"GEN. MCKENZIE: You can look at the map -- you can particularly at the Barzeh site and make your own conclusions."
(quoting Department of Defense Press Briefing by Pentagon Chief Spokesperson Dana W. White and Joint Staff Director Lt. Gen. Kenneth F. McKenzie Jr. in the Pentagon Briefing Room )
me? in the past, one 12" shell would deliver something like a quarter of GJ (gigajoule) of energy (kinetic plus denotation of TNT equivalent), and 76 of these would plow this hectare:
a TLAM has slightly lower kinetic energy, but I think its blast is bigger (LOL of course I don't know what exactly is in the warhead), so no, I don't believe that compound was hit that many times
("Against the first target, the Barzeh Research and Development Center, which is located in the greater Damascus area, we employed 76 missiles; 57 of these were Tomahawk land attack cruise missiles, and 19 were joint air-to-surface standoff missiles, or JASSMs." to Department of Defense Press Briefing by Pentagon Chief Spokesperson Dana W. White and Joint Staff Director Lt. Gen. Kenneth F. McKenzie Jr. in the Pentagon Briefing Room )
just my 'reasonable doubt' here
Today at 8:28 AM
plus there's the accuracy issue:
no 'near miss' there
but with 76 hits announced by the Pentagon, I would've liked to see at least one hole in the 'hood; why? (in addition to the statistics hahaha)
at the other site ('weapons storage close to Homs') my untrained eye sees spots which I put in the yellow ellipses below (the original picture comes from DigitalGlobe, accessed it through
where you could see the view 'before' etc.):
(you might blame the French/English for these LOL!)
my whole point is
If Something Sounds Too Good To Be True,
It Isn't
by the way what's your theory for an absence of craters anywhere in that compound?
and after for exampleApr 17, 2018
followed by
Apr 17, 2018
now
from inside (EDIT just one picture due to 5 images per post limit):
the captions are like
- top-left: TLAM's warhead
- bottom-left: a part of TLAM's engine
- top-right: parts of TLAM's guidance computer
- bottom-right: TLAM's parts
Would Russia Really Sell to Syria the S-300 Air Defense System? (And Why It Might Not Matter)
April 23, 2018
ends with "Thus, even with the S-300, Syria would have no defense against an American cruise missile attack."
now a newer map ():I didn't follow ISIL in Damascus much:
NEW MAP: forces and allied Palestinian militias have liberated Al-Madaniyah and areas north of Al-Joura district from .
all I noticed isYesterday at 8:32 AM
and after for exampleApr 17, 2018
followed by
Apr 17, 2018
now
from inside (EDIT just one picture due to 5 images per post limit):
the captions are like
- top-left: TLAM's warhead
- bottom-left: a part of TLAM's engine
- top-right: parts of TLAM's guidance computer
- bottom-right: TLAM's parts
Four Outlandish Russian Ministry of Defense Claims About The Syrian Missile Raid
In one single press conference, the Kremlin has disputed almost every basic detail about the American, British, and French operation.
April 16, 2018
or Tuesday at 12:18 PM
Would Russia Really Sell to Syria the S-300 Air Defense System? (And Why It Might Not Matter)
April 23, 2018
ends with "Thus, even with the S-300, Syria would have no defense against an American cruise missile attack."
it'll be interesting to see if the US authors like Majumdar, Rogoway now ignore, or quote unquote debunk
(perhaps by saying it's all scrap what the Kremlin showed? LOL including the electronics)
huh?now noticed the tweet
sez it's found two unexploded cruise from last weekend's attack in "rather good condition," has turned them over to who sent them by air to for further examination