Agreed. Too often people confuse the state of a government's domestic policy with its foreign policy. Just because Iran is a religious theocracy with many repressive laws (though to be fair, not much worse than what the Saudis have), doesn't mean it cannot be a positive actor on the world stage.
Now obviously, if Iran is successful in its anti-ISIL operation, it will enjoy increased influence and prestige in Iraq. However, considering Iraq's current state, that might not be a bad thing.
And that, IMHO, is their entire objective.
A growing Al Queda led Calliphate. Right now it makes up half of Syria and haf of Iraq. They hope to defeat all of Iraq...but will have a tought to impossible time of controlling the South (IMHO).
They also hope to defeat Assad.
At some point, they will form (and are foriming) a defacto country. That will bode badly for the future in terms of extremists and terror camps and breeding grounds.
I expect they will ally themselves with the Taliban, and that the Taliban and affiliates of these people will make a push to completely control Afghanistan as soon as the US pulls out.
Syria is fighting them. I expect Iran will try and co-op them or bring them into its sphere. If Iran is successful in doing this...Iran will then itself be an effectual calliphate from the middle of Syria to the Pakistan border. If Pakistan falls to them...they will then be nuclear armed and even larger. THey are also making in roads into Africa.
Sadly, I believe all of this is possible in current geo-strategic situation in the Mid-East.
I wonder if this is the whole idea behind Obama's Pacific Pivot. He's trying to make peace with Al-Qaeda so he can concentrate on China...
This was already discussed after my post...and answered. I said Iran might try and co-opt the ISIS. That does not mean join them.ISIS is sponsored by Saudi Arabia, they are Sunni terrorists and the enemies of Shiite Iran which is why they are fighting the Assad government in Syria who is allied with Iran. There is zero chance of co-operation between the two camps.
Actually this is what happens when the Bush administration not only made a major mess out of invading Iraq and claimed "mission accomplished" when it was far from over but also never held accountable Saudi Arabia, the real source of the 9/11 attacks and continued supporter of terrorists the world over.
I do not think Turkey would have to "switch alliances," at all to do what you propose.This should be the time for Erdogan to change sides. Turkey and Iran are in the best position to intervene together and thus prevent the other of winning control over Iraq. Together they can end the trouble in Syria. The losers would be the sponsors of the terrorists in Syria and Iraq, in the first place Saudi Arabia, and of course the Kurds in Northern Iraq. Would Erdogan have the guts to do this? How would the US react to such a reversal of alliances?