The current Taiwan admin is not afraid of war if it has US support.
Sorry to say they should be very afraid if faith is all they got. Let's just hope the chief is cool headed and wise.
Also, Life trumps political survival.
The current Taiwan admin is not afraid of war if it has US support.
Come on now, the current wen DPP admin in Taiwan is openly hostile toward China. It practically allows US do whatever it wants so its entirely up to US. If US wants it to declare independence now it would. The ball is in US Court.
Refusing a US order is not losing the whole Western market, or any part of it outside of the US. The Western countries themselves don't even accept American requests to ban Huawei. They wouldn't even have a reaction to the ROC refusing a US request to voluntarily kill of one of their own top industries. China is a larger market and more important economic entity for Taiwan's development than the US. For Taiwan's semiconductors to lose the Chinese market, which, once again, is larger than the rest of the world combined, would mean huge losses causing them to lay people off like they're mowing the lawn. Where do these skilled people go when they are laid off? China.Again, Taiwan regards US and entire Western market bigger than China.
How can dropping China market be suicide?
Again, Taiwan regards US and entire Western market bigger than China.
How can dropping China market be suicide?
Huawei’s cutting-edge products and equipment may not be appreciated by the United States, but they have an avid following in many other parts of the world.
The Chinese technology leader yesterday announced record profits and strong overseas growth for last year, placing the firm for the first time beside the likes of Apple and Google’s parent Alphabet in the US$100 billion club.
It is no mean feat given the actions of the White House and American intelligence agencies; bans and criminal charges have been coupled with pressure on countries to keep the firm out of their next-generation 5G networks.
With the financial outlook even more promising, it is obvious that when it comes to telecommunications, governments and customers prefer to put innovation and quality ahead of politics.
The Shenzhen-based company’s annual revenue rose 19.5 per cent to 721.2 billion yuan (US$107.1 billion), with profits up 25 per cent to 59.3 billion yuan. Smartphones and other consumer goods comprised the bulk of earnings, with the carrier business slightly down on last year, although it is forecast to jump as 5G network contracts are signed.
Like its smartphones, Huawei’s 5G equipment is praised for being more advanced, of equal or better quality and cheaper than rivals.
It has already signed contracts accounting for 28 per cent of the global market. Such successes do not sit well with the White House, which has put the company at the centre of its strategy to stall China’s technological rise – to the point that US President Donald Trump has said it may be used as a bargaining chip in trade war negotiations.
On the pretext such equipment is a threat to national security, the US has for months been pressuring allies to follow its lead by imposing bans.
Australia has already joined in as has New Zealand until concerns are allayed, but the two other members of the “Five Eyes” intelligence alliance, Britain and Canada, have yet to make a decision.
Doubts stem from Beijing’s 2017 law that compels companies to help with intelligence gathering if ordered to, but a government-led oversight board in Britain determined this week that security flaws in software, not state interference, are problematic.
US calls for a boycott were also ignored by the European Commission, which instead of imposing a blanket ban, advised its 28 member governments to assess threats in their national markets.
Worries about the security of 5G networks are understandable; while providing ultra-fast speeds, they enable many more devices to be connected with greater precision.
Huawei, like every other company involved, has to ensure data is safe by closing off software and hardware vulnerabilities. Choices and the direction taken should be up to governments and consumers, not the US.
Trump now even is getting slammed with reality because the question now is in his trade war against China is what is he willing to lose in order to win. If the US is so mighty, why not end trade with China right now. The US doesn't need China. Yet he's not ending trade.