Unless the specs are specifically designed to match a product. The PLA General issue helmet is claimed to be superior to the NATO Standard okay fine. But do the Airborne units feel that they need that? Previous airborne helmets didn't match that level of protection and being honest most of the threat is not actually rifle based but fragmentation effects as such the FAST would be plenty.
FAST was designed to be modular, able to be used with communications gear and lighter than the standard issue. Even compared to MICH or ACH.
It’s possible that they do have a contract that lets them buy universal parts like helmet straps etc for cost saving. But probably not the whole thing.
Again for parts of this maybe. The Night vision mount okay.
But the side rails are identical to those on FAST. And between the two is the lanyard system that helps better mount the NOD.
Those are designed for specific functions to mount M1913 rail systems, The PLA didn't adopt that wide spread. They double in being able to mount breathing apparatus or armored mandible. For paratroopers breathing apparatus is more important.
As well as radio head sets.
The retention system is Gentex baby.
But the Velcro sells to me that these are either off the shelf real deal or knock off bump models.
The PLA doesn't seem to mount anything on it. The real deal uses that space for a number of functions. Patches and ensignia, wiring if com head sets, even an add on armored applaque.