I have literally never once refuted any sources within my history of being here.12 "sources" which are openly partisan and unreliable. Interesting how Indian media and Wikipedia are now considered reliable.
- Your source has no mention of satellite imageryIndia's former chief of army staff openly refuted those claims. Yet somehow he isn't mentioned among those "generals and Marshalls lol
You are conveniently forgetting that shortly later China pulled back from the historic Indian perception of the lac.- Your source has no mention of satellite imagery
- Satellite imagery from Bloomberg, Google Earth, Maxar Technologies, CNES/Airbus, Landsat/Copernicus geolocated and confirmed loss of territory:
View attachment 126592
Now, lets use 2 Indian sources to verify this:
View attachment 126593
Here is your satellite imagery which literally contradicts what you've said earlier, about satellite imagery showing no loss of territory. Sources which are biased towards India, are refuting your unfounded claims. I provided 15 sources now, whereas you've provided one, with no empirical evidence.
However....You are conveniently forgetting that shortly later China pulled back from the historic Indian perception of the lac.
This is just one source out of many
However....
You are also ignoring the fact that it resulted in a net gain of territory for China..?
Both events occurring after the military disengagement.
"Former MP from the , said in a tweet that India had withdrawn from its own territory."
You're deviating from the actual point. The fact of the matter is, is that India lost territory to China. That's the reality of the situation, if you don't want to believe it, despite empirical data showing otherwise, that's up to you.
Lol you are claiming "empirical evidence" yet posting nothing but unsubstantiated claims from politicians like swamy. You just conveniently ignored all the satellite imagery evidence you asked for which shows pla is on its side of the lac.However....
You are also ignoring the fact that it resulted in a net gain of territory for China..?
Both events occurring after the military disengagement.
"Former MP from the , said in a tweet that India had withdrawn from its own territory."
You're deviating from the actual point. The fact of the matter is, is that India lost territory to China. That's the reality of the situation, if you don't want to believe it, despite empirical data showing otherwise, that's up to you.
You've completely ignored my point. "Lol you are claiming "empirical evidence" yet posting nothing but unsubstantiated claims from politicians like swamy." Which are the satellite imagery taken after 2020. If you don't understand what empirical evidence is, then don't try to use a red herring fallacy to ignore incompetency in your argument.Lol you are claiming "empirical evidence" yet posting nothing but unsubstantiated claims from politicians like swamy. You just conveniently ignored all the satellite imagery evidence you asked for which shows pla is on its side of the lac.
Some more neutral sources for anyone interested:
India supposedly "lost territory," yet all of China's positions are behind the same lac which has been in place since 1962. That definitely makes sense.
The front line and the lac are literally the same thing in this context. Check Google Earth because it's pretty clear you have no idea where the lac even is yet you are trying to lecture me on it. I have also shown you multiple satellite images showing the lac in comparison to the Chinese pullback under disengagent.You've completely ignored my point. "Lol you are claiming "empirical evidence" yet posting nothing but unsubstantiated claims from politicians like swamy." Which are the satellite imagery taken after 2020.
"India supposedly "lost territory," yet all of China's positions are behind the same lac which has been in place since 1962. That definitely makes sense."
Satellite imagery is there for you to look at. After the withdrawal and disengagement from the FRONT LINE. Not LAC. Basic comprehension.
I won't be replying anymore since you've failed repeatedly to acknowledge any sources, yet you expect me to kowtow to yours. Even used sources biased towards the Indians.