Indian Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

Pataliputra

Junior Member
Registered Member
So the former IAF chief, BS Dhanoa is qualified to define what a 5th generation fighter is? That same guy who said that his Su-30MKI can detect a J-20 beyond even that of the Su-30MKI's own radar range? That same guy who called the J-20 China's bluff? That same guy who said that the Rafael will outclass the entire PLAAF? You trust this guy? Wokay.

I mean, even the US military respects the J-20 and the PLAAF. But India can simply belittle and dismiss them. That means that even the F-35 is not considered a 5th gen fighter according to Dhanoa's standards. Damn, India is definitely mightier than the US.

So, when India's AMCA FGFA is ready, the Indian Air Force is gonna outclass all the air forces of the entire world! Akhand Bharat could finally be realised with the power of that super duper AMCA FGFA! My god, the Chinese leadership and the PLA must be sweating already. Jai Hind!
The price of one India-specific Rafale is $400 million USD, while an F35 costs just $90 million USD. Indian Air Force places significant trust in Rafales for specific reasons.
 

Sardaukar20

Captain
Registered Member
The M88 core generates only 73kN of wet thrust, which is similar to the thrust produced by the Kaveri engine, but the kaveri is heavier. The plan to integrate the M88 into the Kaveri was abandoned a while ago. Presently, the Kaveri engine is undergoing certification for use in the GHATAK UCAV drone and also in one Tejas prototype for testing and technology demonstrations.
View attachment 122964
The M88 core doesn't generate the wet trust. It's actually the whole M88 turbofan engine itself. But you're the expert in jet engines anyway, you should have already known what the difference is between a core and a entire turbofan engine. Please, enlighten us further.

Where did you get these figures for the Kaveri engine? I can't confirm these numbers myself on the internet. Nevermind, I trust you bro.
 

Gloire_bb

Captain
Registered Member
The Indian Air Force chief BS Dhanoa stated that the J20 isn't a fifth-generation fighter jet, dismissing it as merely a Chinese claim.
Well, what else can he say?
Unless there will be shooting, he gets away with it. But so did Indian MKIs before 2019, with weapon systems 1-2 generations behind the opponent. Until there was an incident.

The fact is, J-20 is a different level of capability, supported by much better force multipliers. And the overall situation is such that it forces political consequences, undermining India's original geographical superiority.
India actually declined the Russian FGFA, SU 57, stating it wasn't a genuine fifth-generation fighter jet.
That's indeed a story of unprecedented success. The result is that India is left with 3 dozen Rafales for its first-class capability. Primary MKI fleet still hasn't started their upgrade(fighter isn't fine wine, 20+ years don't make it even better).
All of it together leaves the stating party at a qualitative parity with a much weaker Pakistan - and, adding insult to injury, effectively parries much larger former and concurrent Indian investment.

Against China, IAF for the foreseeable future can only maintain a [weak] defensive state, because the nature of the northern border limits the effect of GBAD(mountains) - even if PLAAF deploys only a limited amount of forces (qualitative suppression).
Given that these two opponents are likely to happen simultaneously, after many decades of qualitative superiority over both (India maintained at least a qualitive overmatch over both China and Pakistan since 1960s) - it's a magnificent result from a loved branch of Indian military.
No, not really.
That's why India is working on its own AMCA FGFA. Similarly, the French Air Force doesn't possess a FGFA either.
To be relevant, FGFA should be nearing FOC service now.

Instead, it wasn't even revealed to the public - instead, its development is accompanied now by a significant spread of HAL resources onto other, parallel projects(Tejas mk.2; TEDBA). Now HAL added HLFT-42, which is a yet another fighter (spare me trainer bs, it doesn't even pretend to be simplified).
Certainly, two batches of Rafale asquisition also directly eat away from it and all the listed above.

French Air Force seats two sets of borders away from the nearest unfriendly country (Russia), against which can always expect to deploy with friends, the way it want; it isn't threatened in any way.
 
Last edited:

ACuriousPLAFan

Brigadier
Registered Member
India actually declined the Russian FGFA, SU 57, stating it wasn't a genuine fifth-generation fighter jet.
More like HAL pulled out of the FGFA project after getting duped billions of dollars by Sukhoi, just to have Su-57 being formally introduced into active service with the VVS merely a year afterwards.

That's why India is working on its own AMCA FGFA. Similarly, the French Air Force doesn't possess a FGFA either.
Despite the difficulties and challenges of working with (underperforming) partners like Germany, the French is actually working on a 6th-gen fighter project as we speak.

In the meantime, the AMCA is not a 6th-gen fighter, no matter how much the IAF tries to sugarcoat AMCA as being one merely because AMCA will have "6th-gen technologies". So there's that.

The Indian Air Force chief BS Dhanoa stated that the J20 isn't a fifth-generation fighter jet, dismissing it as merely a Chinese claim.
Should that be the actual mentality held by the top brass of the Indian military, no wonder.
 

gelgoog

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
More like HAL pulled out of the FGFA project after getting duped billions of dollars by Sukhoi, just to have Su-57 being formally introduced into active service with the VVS merely a year afterwards.
India never paid billions for the FGFA project. It was more like $295 million USD.
The FGFA was supposed to be a dual seater variant of the PAK FA designed specifically for India.

The dual seater variant of the Su-57 still hasn't entered service. They haven't even flown the prototype yet. We only have some patents describing it.

1703324594851.jpeg

The Rafale is a bad deal. For that price India could have gotten like three Su-57 for the price of each of those Rafale. Even the current production Su-57, without the Megapolis upgrades, is a much superior aircraft to the Rafale.
 

phrozenflame

Junior Member
Registered Member
The Indian Air Force chief BS Dhanoa stated that the J20 isn't a fifth-generation fighter jet, dismissing it as merely a Chinese claim.
India actually declined the Russian FGFA, SU 57, stating it wasn't a genuine fifth-generation fighter jet. That's why India is working on its own AMCA FGFA. Similarly, the French Air Force doesn't possess a FGFA either.
The guy's living up to his name, BS Dhanoa.

AMCA FGFA is at a stage where it's 3d drawings arent approved, we're looking at 2045-2050 range.
 
Last edited:

Sardaukar20

Captain
Registered Member
Should that be the actual mentality held by the top brass of the Indian military, no wonder.
Good. It's mentality like this that is more dangerous to India than it's enemies. Ignorance, hubris, incompetence, overconfidence, and stupidity. BS Dhanoa was the man in charge of the Indian Air Force when the Pakistani Air Force flew over and dropped bombs on Indian territory in broad daylight, shot down at least one Indian fighter jet, and India shooting down its own SAR helicopter.
 
Last edited:

Gloire_bb

Captain
Registered Member
The Rafale is a bad deal. For that price India could have gotten like three Su-57 for the price of each of those Rafale. Even the current production Su-57, without the Megapolis upgrades, is a much superior aircraft to the Rafale.
it couldn't, comparing the internal fly-away price with the full contract price(for India of all places, i.e. with modifier basically) is wrong.
On top of that, Rafale is fully operational with IAF right now, as it's a fully mature platform.
Su-57 is only somewhere around IOC at its country of origin.
 
Top