Aesthetics is a different thing but what i have concluded after checking the specs of this fighter jet is that it’s the world’s best in it’s category of fighter jetsSorry, to be clear my point is that over the past thirty years it has not been flying in the sense of having airframes in service with each accumulating >100 flight hours/yr. Today and going forward, yes, the aircraft "is flying". As more aircraft are produced and cleared to full operational envelope, there will be crashes. This is to be expected. Elevating safety record to top priority will not advance India's interests. India can afford crashes, what it cannot afford is stagnation borne of unwillingness to take risks and "do". LCA was ready to fly for 12 months prior to its first flight but nobody was willing to authorise it. This is the kind of mentality that needs to change.
Tejas looks attractive from some angles, less so from others. I would not say it is a particularly attractive aircraft, but it is not ugly either. Lengthening the fuselage for Mk. 2 will improve the appearance.
The only thing I didn’t like was American engine only if India replaces American engines with their indigenous engines it will become one of the best selling fighter jets in the world and I think India can do that
India is buying 100 GE F404 engines for 83 Mk1A jets with spare parts so that they can continue to use these jets even under American Sanctions.
Last edited: