Indian Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

Rettam Stacf

Junior Member
Registered Member
  • Do we have an update on construction of Vikrant?

I know the bhakts are trying to justify the delays by saying the aircraft carrier can fly in the air and launch A380s, but still

From this Economic Times article, the Vikrant is :
  • Currently undergoing final sea trial at Karwar near Gujarat.
  • Hand over to Indian Navy in August
  • No decision has yet been made on which fix wing aircraft (26) will be used.
India scouts for aircraft manufacturers through G2G route for 26 aircraft for INS Vikrant
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Sardaukar20

Captain
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Modi Faces Jobs Backlash With Short-Term Indian Army Enlistment​

  • Protest erupt with reports of train coaches set on fire
  • Unemployment rate in India fell but remains elevated
Apparently its called the 'Agnipath Scheme', and for some reason, Indians are angrily protesting it.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The new plan is being called the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
scheme.
As a part of this new scheme, about
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
will be recruited each year
. However, most of them will have to leave the service after just four years. This is because only 25 per cent of them will be allowed to continue their job for another 15 years under permanent commission. Since the number of permanently recruited soldiers will diminish, this plan is expected to reduce the defence pension bill, which has been a growing concern for the government for many years.
Oh I see. The Indian military wants to recruit 450000 to 50000 troops per year. They want to rapidly recruit troops, but want to avoid the costly pension bills by releasing most of these troops after 4 years.

The eligibility criteria for this scheme include applicants who are aged between 17.5 and 21 years old who will be eligible to apply.
Upon selection, the agniveers will go through six months of training and will then be deployed for three and a half years. Their starting salary is expected to be Rs. 30,000 (approximately $384) along with receiving additional benefits. Their salary will reach up to Rs. 40,000 (approximately $512) by the end of the four-year service.
6 months of basic training, then straightaway deployed to the field for 3.5 years. That's quite a rush to get fresh bodies to the field. Very suspiciously aimed at China. Rushing 6-month trained new recruits into India-China border. What could go wrong?

Despite claims that the Agnipath scheme will provide youth with a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to serve their country, which will contribute to national development, protests have emerged across
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
against the plan
.
I thought the Indian youths would be patriotic to volunteer to serve their nation? I thought that this is way better than that 'single-child' conscription practice in China? So why are Indians protesting against it?

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, for instance, in Bihar and Rajasthan, are occurring, with people shouting slogans against the Agnipath scheme as well as staging demonstrations. Army aspirants have disrupted rail and road traffic in Bihar, and these protests have now taken on a violent turn. On Thursday, people against the scheme burned tyres, vandalised bushes and set trains on fire.
It looks like many Indian youths are really upset about the Agnipath Scheme. Why?

One of the reasons this is happening is because people who want to apply to the Indian army are agitated by the fact that the foundation of the Agnipath scheme is a four-year contract. Individuals have voiced their apprehensions over the future of their services. Many of these people value job stability, which includes retirement benefits and pensions over competitive salaries. Most of them will be forced to leave the job within four years, which doesn’t fit into their hopes and aspirations.
But people are concerned that the skills they learn as a soldier will not be applicable to the different jobs in civil society. Additionally, they’re worried that job recruiters will not give them preference over others because of their Agniveer status when looking for people to fill in new positions.
So the issue is job security? When Indians are facing an unemployment crisis. The Indian military can only give a 4-year contract. So most Indians are more concerned over this than actually being grateful to serve the nation. So what about that legendary Indian patriotism? The thing they so often say that will give the Indian Jawans greater morale advantage over those Chinese 'single child conscripts? Is money more important than the honor of serving and dying for India?

“Where will we go after working for only 4 years? We will be homeless after 4 years of service. So we have jammed the roads; the country’s leaders will not get to know that people are aware,” a protestor in Jehanabad told the news agency ANI.
Only in India, where the youth fears homelessness after completing 4 years of military service. This fear doesn't exist in Israel, South Korea, and Singapore. Not even in China.

Another aspect people are worried about is the amount of time allotted to training. It reportedly takes two to three years to train a member of the army, but as a part of the Agnipath scheme, soldiers will only be trained for six months.
The Indian top brass apparently only wants bodies on the frontlines, aka more Jawans. They don't really care if they can actually fight. Are they really that desperate?

“We work hard to get inducted into the armed forces. How will the service be for four years, with months of training and leaves? How will we protect the nation after getting trained for just three years? Govt has to take back this scheme,” another protestor said.
Jai Hind!
 
Last edited:

caudaceus

Senior Member
Registered Member
Apparently its called the 'Agnipath Scheme', and for some reason, Indians are angrily protesting it.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



Oh I see. The Indian military wants to recruit 450000 to 50000 troops per year. They want to rapidly recruit troops, but want to avoid the costly pension bills by releasing most of these troops after 4 years.



6 months of basic training, then straightaway deployed to the field for 3.5 years. That's quite a rush to get fresh bodies to the field. Very suspiciously aimed at China. Rushing 6-month trained new recruits into India-China border. What could go wrong?


I thought the Indian youths would be patriotic to volunteer to serve their nation? I thought that this is way better than that 'single-child' conscription practice in China? So why are Indians protesting against it?


It looks like many Indian youths are really upset about the Agnipath Scheme. Why?



So the issue is job security? When Indians are facing an unemployment crisis. The Indian military can only give a 4-year contract. So most Indians are more concerned over this than actually being grateful to serve the nation. So what about that legendary Indian patriotism? The thing they so often say that will give the Indian Jawans greater morale advantage over those Chinese 'single child conscripts? Is money more important than the honor of serving and dying for India?


Only in India, where the youth fears homelessness after completing 4 years of military service. This fear doesn't exist in Israel, South Korea, and Singapore. Not even in China.


The Indian top brass apparently only wants bodies on the frontlines, aka more Jawans. They don't really care if they can actually fight. Are they really that desperate?


Jai Hind!
I mean that wasn't mandatory right? Then why do they burn trains and vandalize things if they disagree with the scheme?
 

Abominable

Major
Registered Member
Apparently its called the 'Agnipath Scheme', and for some reason, Indians are angrily protesting it.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
To me it seems like a convoluted way to reduce soldier numbers. Reduce numbers by increasing numbers temporarily.

How will they decide which 25% to keep in 4 years? It's one thing to have a fitness test for admission, but 4 years in it seems strange to use something like that for a long term contract. Maybe they will check their balls as a test like that video posted here?
 

Sardaukar20

Captain
Registered Member
I mean that wasn't mandatory right? Then why do they burn trains and vandalize things if they disagree with the scheme?
It is not mandatory. I think the main cause of that anger is that 75% of military applicants would no longer enjoy permanent employment in the military. Which also means no special benefits and pension upon retirement. So it's all about job security and money at the end of the day.

India doesn't need conscription, because their 'demographics dividend' should provide more than enough volunteers. The problem is that there are too many volunteers. The Indian military want them all, but only want to fully pay 25% of them with professional rates, 4 years later.

To me it seems like a convoluted way to reduce soldier numbers. Reduce numbers by increasing numbers temporarily.

How will they decide which 25% to keep in 4 years? It's one thing to have a fitness test for admission, but 4 years in it seems strange to use something like that for a long term contract. Maybe they will check their balls as a test like that video posted here?
Actually I don't see it that way. I see that as a convoluted way to go cheap on maintaining a sizable size of soldiers.

They could recruit about 50k of new soldiers a year. Then discard 75% of them 4 years later. Only 25% or about 12500 of them can get to be employed as full professionals with full benefits and pensions.

In a way, the Indian military is aiming to grow sizable force, but also pay less to maintain that force. They want more bodies, but want to do it cheap.

So the real big question is, why do they wanna go cheap?
 

56860

Senior Member
Registered Member
Do we have an update on construction of Vikrant?

I know the bhakts are trying to justify the delays by saying the aircraft carrier can fly in the air and launch A380s, but still
I thought it's already finished construction and is awaiting commissioning?

Serious question: This carrier was built with Indian steel, Russian 'aviation complex', Israeli radar & SAM. Italian guns, Russian CIWS, indigenous combat management system with Russian collaboration, US engines, Indian gearboxes, Italian or Spanish air surveillance radar.

Aren't the logistics on this thing going to be a nightmare?
 

Overbom

Brigadier
Registered Member
I thought it's already finished construction and is awaiting commissioning?

Serious question: This carrier was built with Indian steel, Russian 'aviation complex', Israeli radar & SAM. Italian guns, Russian CIWS, indigenous combat management system with Russian collaboration, US engines, Indian gearboxes, Italian or Spanish air surveillance radar.

Aren't the logistics on this thing going to be a nightmare?
India + logistics/maintenance dont match togather. Have you seen their aircraft composition..
 

sdkan

New Member
Registered Member
I thought it's already finished construction and is awaiting commissioning?

Serious question: This carrier was built with Indian steel, Russian 'aviation complex', Israeli radar & SAM. Italian guns, Russian CIWS, indigenous combat management system with Russian collaboration, US engines, Indian gearboxes, Italian or Spanish air surveillance radar.

Aren't the logistics on this thing going to be a nightmare?

IAF aircraft come from eight countries

Is that why Indians are good managers

They are good at creating problems first and then solving them
 
Top