LOL! Its just so predictable. That is just so India.
So what happens to their 2030 space station target? It was supposed to be 8 years left to go. But no, that's not ambitious enough. Now they wanna do it in 7 years? Jai Hind!
LOL! Its just so predictable. That is just so India.
LOL! Its just so predictable. That is just so India.
So what happens to their 2030 space station target? It was supposed to be 8 years left to go. But no, that's not ambitious enough. Now they wanna do it in 7 years? Jai Hind!
They’ve ditched it for manned lunar landing.
It's a typo, they meant to say 2300LOL! Its just so predictable. That is just so India.
So what happens to their 2030 space station target? It was supposed to be 8 years left to go. But no, that's not ambitious enough. Now they wanna do it in 7 years? Jai Hind!
Why stop at manned lunar landing? They should be going for manned solar landing, world firstThey’ve ditched it for manned lunar landing.
Well, Trump has already reserved the spot of world first manned solar landing. No one dares to compete with him, not even Modi. Meanwhile, the spots for the first cowed lunar/solar/mars/etc. landing are still open.Why stop at manned lunar landing? They should be going for manned solar landing, world first
1) Learn from the US Navy? Yes I agree. Plenty to learn from there.With only 10 years of naval aviation under its belt, China has a lot to learn from US Navy and Indian Navy.
Yes the US had been operating aircraft carriers for 100 years. But you don't need 100 years to learn about aircraft carrier operations. China does not need to learn too much from US WWII carrier operations. China needs to learn from US carrier operations in the last 20 years. Plus, China is learning fast. It has already started using EMALS catapults for their next aircraft carrier that is under-construction. Only the 2nd nation on Earth to do so. While India is still struggling to finish INS Vikrant, a ski-jump aircraft carrier.While the Chinese media may pass caustic comments on US aircraft carrier operations, fact is that fighter accidents onboard aircraft carriers are part and parcel of flight operations. The cold facts are that US Navy has been operating aircraft carriers for 100 years with some 70-odd carriers serving the nation and another three under construction.
LOL! I'm sorry? What? Indian Air Force pilots gets disoriented on the high seas without a land reference point? What, is this? 1942? No other professional fighter pilots today are complaining about getting lost at sea. The Pakistani Air Force does have naval strike doctrine. Do they get lost at sea during an exercise? Besides, do you really need an aircraft carrier to navigate your aircraft at sea?Many an armchair analysts have argued that carrier-based aviation is prohibitively expensive and outdated due to existence of long distance ballistic missiles. They recommend that shore-based fighters could do the same job as the carrier with mid-air refueling option giving the much-needed operational range. However, the Indian Navy found that the shore-based fighter pilots of the Indian Air Force found themselves disoriented on high seas without land in sight and used as a reference point.
It does not matter what India did to Pakistan in 1971. China is not 1971 Pakistan.The Chinese military and propaganda media have often passed judgements on Indian military prowess without realising that India has been operating aircraft carriers since 1961 and has an amazing record of maritime aviation including 1971 blockading of Karachi harbour.
PLA aircraft carrier operations was already born. It is not still to be born. India just cannot accept that China will be overtaking India in aircraft carrier capabilities. China will be having an EMALS-capable aircraft carrier in a few years time. Chinese aircraft carriers right now have far more indigenous components in their construction than all of India's aircraft carriers combined.While India has already decommissioned two of its aircraft carriers, the PLA Navy carrier operation is still to be born.
Haven't they've been watching the news? The PLAN had done all that. Including night operations. You don't need 50 years to figure out aircraft carrier operations in clear days, rough seas, storms, and night. Only India needs that amount of time.While the Chinese have successfully copied the Russian Su-33 carrier-based aircraft to stand its own J-15 line, the naval aviation cannot be copied, and the only option is training the fighter pilots on high seas and pitch-black darkness. Fact is that Chinese naval aviation has at least a decade to go before it starts to acquire long sea legs.
Nobody has ever tested the survivability of their aircraft carriers against Chinese AshBM. India is welcomed to be the first to volunteer. Besides, why is India developing Agni-P, if AshBMs are such a bad idea?Even though China has deployed long range ballistic missiles on its eastern seaboard to deter US carriers, the flat-top vessels have remarkable survival capabilities with the strike group defended by nuclear powered submarines with intercontinental range ballistic missiles and destroyers armed with long range cruise missiles. Since the carrier is constantly on the move, it is not only difficult to target the vessel and at the same time exposing the fixed missile sites to a lethal counter.
China fought a border war with Indian in 1962. India was defeated, and humiliated. If India had won, the Indians would have reported it as the greatest war victory in the history of mankind. Vietnam gave the PLA a good fight, but the PLA was not defeated. At least Vietnam can give China a good fight. India in all its glorious might, can't even match miniscule Vietnam in giving the PLA a good fight. That is not something to be proud of.The world may be threatened by an aggressive PLA and ever growing war making arsenal of China, but one must remember that the Communist China has only fought a border skirmish with India in 1962 and was taken to task by miniscule Vietnam in 1979. Projecting power on turbulent seas far way from home is a different ball game.
Something to do with the F-35C crash news, but not worthy to be in that thread. This is a piece of pure copium by the Indian press. It gets funnier the longer I read it.
1) Learn from the US Navy? Yes I agree. Plenty to learn from there.
2) Learn from the Indian Navy? You gotta be kidding me! Using farming tractors to push planes on the deck of INS Viraat? Over-spending on a compromised STOBAR carrier, INS Vikramatditya? 13 years, and counting to build and commission the INS Vikrant? No thanks. China is better off just learning from the US Navy.
Yes the US had been operating aircraft carriers for 100 years. But you don't need 100 years to learn about aircraft carrier operations. China does not need to learn too much from US WWII carrier operations. China needs to learn from US carrier operations in the last 20 years. Plus, China is learning fast. It has already started using EMALS catapults for their next aircraft carrier that is under-construction. Only the 2nd nation on Earth to do so. While India is still struggling to finish INS Vikrant, a ski-jump aircraft carrier.
LOL! I'm sorry? What? Indian Air Force pilots gets disoriented on the high seas without a land reference point? What, is this? 1942? No other professional fighter pilots today are complaining about getting lost at sea. The Pakistani Air Force does have naval strike doctrine. Do they get lost at sea during an exercise? Besides, do you really need an aircraft carrier to navigate your aircraft at sea?
It does not matter what India did to Pakistan in 1971. China is not 1971 Pakistan.
PLA aircraft carrier operations was already born. It is not still to be born. India just cannot accept that China will be overtaking India in aircraft carrier capabilities. China will be having an EMALS-capable aircraft carrier in a few years time. Chinese aircraft carriers right now have far more indigenous components in their construction than all of India's aircraft carriers combined.
Haven't they've been watching the news? The PLAN had done all that. Including night operations. You don't need 50 years to figure out aircraft carrier operations in clear days, rough seas, storms, and night. Only India needs that amount of time.
Nobody has ever tested the survivability of their aircraft carriers against Chinese AshBM. India is welcomed to be the first to volunteer. Besides, why is India developing Agni-P, if AshBMs are such a bad idea?
Chinese AshBM have been tested a several times already. Haven't you seen those moving mock aircraft carrier targets in the Gobi Desert? PLARF have clearly been testing their missiles on moving targets. Then, who says about fixed missile sites? DF-21Ds and DF-26s are TEL launched. TELs are a lot harder to find than aircraft carriers.
China fought a border war with Indian in 1962. India was defeated, and humiliated. If India had won, the Indians would have reported it as the greatest war victory in the history of mankind. Vietnam gave the PLA a good fight, but the PLA was not defeated. At least Vietnam can give China a good fight. India in all its glorious might, can't even match miniscule Vietnam in giving the PLA a good fight. That is not something to be proud of.
China has no plans to use aircraft carriers for power projection. Unless India forces China to do so. India does not have good memories of fighting with China. So stop provoking China into a conflict. Stop threatening to block the Malacca Straits. Stop trying to grab Chinese territories. Stop playing with Tibet. Stop sponsoring terrorists to sabotage the BRI and kill Chinese nationals.
Those are the same folks who confused a satellite photo of crew wiping down the deck of Shandong with cracks on the carrier deck. You are wasting your breath here.