Indian Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

sequ

sequ

Major
Registered Member
They wanted a multirole fighter and chose an interceptor delta wing design. No wonder it ended up underpowered and overweight.

Should've stuck with a conventional cropped-delta wing+ horizontal stab design or made the delta wing smaller and add canards. Which surprisingly they are doing for the Mk2 lmao

Talk about trying to rectify problems that could've been avoided in the first place.

Meanwhile that what the Tejas should've been is in service since 2007, built in the high 100's and underwent subsequent upgrades.
 
Deino

Deino

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
sequ said:
They wanted a multirole fighter and chose an interceptor delta wing design. No wonder it ended up underpowered and overweight.

Should've stuck with a conventional cropped-delta wing+ horizontal stab design or made the delta wing smaller and add canards. Which surprisingly they are doing for the Mk2 lmao

Talk about trying to rectify problems that could've been avoided in the first place.

Meanwhile that what the Tejas should've been is in service since 2007, built in the high 100's and underwent subsequent upgrades.
Click to expand...

Amen … an almost perfect summary of the situation!

Again, no-one wants to belittle the Tejas but one should be realistic in what it reached against it’s initial aims and claims, what it is now and maybe will be in the Mk.2 variant.
 
P

Pataliputra

Junior Member
Registered Member
sequ said:
They wanted a multirole fighter and chose an interceptor delta wing design. No wonder it ended up underpowered and overweight.

Should've stuck with a conventional cropped-delta wing+ horizontal stab design or made the delta wing smaller and add canards. Which surprisingly they are doing for the Mk2 lmao

Talk about trying to rectify problems that could've been avoided in the first place.

Meanwhile that what the Tejas should've been is in service since 2007, built in the high 100's and underwent subsequent upgrades.
Click to expand...
The Tejas MK2 is as big as F16 and cannot fulfill the role of a light fighter as intended by the Indian Air Force (IAF). The IAF demanded a small and light fighter to replace the Mig-21, a Medium Weight Fighter (Tejas MK2) to replace the Mirage 2000, Mig-29, and Jaguars, and a Heavy Weight Fighter (AMCA) to replace the Su-30MKI.
 
Deino

Deino

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
hlcc said:
I sure hope its not as big as the F-16, F-16’s engine is almost 40% more powerful than MK2’s planned engine.
Click to expand...


It is … and as such taht‘s again the problem! A fighter project too late after yet another complete redesign and instead of going from Tejas 1/1A to a useful larger one directly they tried again but forgot again the mots important part! The engine issue.

As such, you surely get a decent fighter - like the Gripen E - albeit again decades too late and most likely still not on par, while all potential adversaries around use even more capable fighters in at least one class above (J-10C, J-16 …)
 
P

Pataliputra

Junior Member
Registered Member
Deino said:
It is … and as such taht‘s again the problem! A fighter project too late after yet another complete redesign and instead of going from Tejas 1/1A to a useful larger one directly they tried again but forgot again the mots important part! The engine issue.

As such, you surely get a decent fighter - like the Gripen E - albeit again decades too late and most likely still not on par, while all potential adversaries around use even more capable fighters in at least one class above (J-10C, J-16 …)
Click to expand...
No single engine 4th generation fighter jet in the world is as capable as Gripen, Gripen is by far the most capable single engine 4th generation fighter jet
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top