Tejas MK2 will be more capable, and will also have a radar cross section of just 0.1 meter squareExactly, and that‚s why it makes no sense at all to develop a less capable decades later and over-hype it whenever it fits an agenda!
Tejas MK2 will be more capable, and will also have a radar cross section of just 0.1 meter squareExactly, and that‚s why it makes no sense at all to develop a less capable decades later and over-hype it whenever it fits an agenda!
Please describe how f-16v or j-10c are less capable in anything.No single engine 4th generation fighter jet in the world is as capable as Gripen, Gripen is by far the most capable single engine 4th generation fighter jet
They aren't indian, of course. Having the "Jai Hind!" perk grants an automatic +2 to every character statPlease describe how f-16v or j-10c are less capable in anything.
Data on Chinese fighter jets is generally not publicly available. But, compared to other single-engine fourth-generation jets, the Gripen is far superior. You can verify this by checking its specifications and notice that modern fourth-generation jets tend to have a low radar cross-section. The under development Tejas MK2 is projected to have an RCS of just 0.1 meter squarePlease describe how f-16v or j-10c are less capable in anything.
All the data regarding Tejas MK2 is available on HAL website I will quote it here after some timeHow many percent lighter?
As a Swede i must defend the Gripen so ill add "the ability to operate from dispersed airfields".Please describe how f-16v or j-10c are less capable in anything.
Even a 10 year old can tell that the Gripen is the most capable single engine 4th generation fighter jet, based solely on specifications; you don't need to be a fighter pilot to understand this. However, I agree that possessing a high-tech modern fighter does not guarantee success in air warfare. Factors such as quantity, AWACS, drones, surface-to-air missiles, radars, and several others play a role. A country purchases fighter jets based on its specific requirements.As a Swede i must defend the Gripen so ill add "the ability to operate from dispersed airfields".
What i do not get is what this have to do with India that do not operate them ?
Since this is already gone of the rails ill add two simulator videos comparing the F-16V and Gripen.
I think if India can make a jet like the J-8II domestically with little to no foreign components, then this debate can actually go somewhere lol. At this point, I have feeling that that old fart of a plane can still hold its own against the current version Tejas...Data on Chinese fighter jets is generally not publicly available. But, compared to other single-engine fourth-generation jets, the Gripen is far superior. You can verify this by checking its specifications and notice that modern fourth-generation jets tend to have a low radar cross-section. The under development Tejas MK2 is projected to have an RCS of just 0.1 meter square
Your feelings don't define the capabilities of a fighter jet; specifications do.I think if India can make a jet like the J-8II domestically with little to no foreign components, then this debate can actually go somewhere lol. At this point, I have feeling that that old fart of a plane can still hold its own against the current version Tejas...
This is coming from a guy who bases 95% of his argument on wishful thinking and sometimes straight up lies..Your feelings don't define the capabilities of a fighter jet; specifications do.